Resource: The Archaeology of Knowledge

From Lyndsey Twining
Revision as of 12:04, 20 April 2019 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Review)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search



Summary

Useful Content

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. The Discursive Regularities
    1. The unities of discourse
    2. Discursive formations
    3. The formation of objects
    4. The formation of enunciative modalities
    5. The formation of concepts
    6. The formation of strategies
    7. Remarks and consequences
  3. The Statement and the Archives
    1. Defining the statement
    2. The enunciative function
    3. The description of statements
    4. Rarity, exteriority, accumulation
    5. The historical a priori and the archive
  4. Archaeological Description
    1. Archaeology and the history of ideas
    2. The original and the regular
    3. Contradictions
    4. The comparative facts
    5. Change and transformations
    6. Science and Knowledge
  5. Conclusion

Review

  • Maybe I am too stupid to understand this? His way of writing is so round-about.
  • I wanted to include this theory in relation to the ontological framework I would make regarding my choice of how to structure my DB, but maybe it is too theoretical.
  • I feel like this kind of "high-level" theory is necessary for my research to be accepted, but I should think more about exactly how to incorporate it and from what approach to study it. Maybe there is a better theory than Foucault?