Difference between revisions of "Resource: Advancing Digital Humanities"

From Lyndsey Twining
Jump to: navigation, search
(Table of Contents)
 
Line 31: Line 31:
 
#Materialities of Software: Logistics, Labour, Infrastructure
 
#Materialities of Software: Logistics, Labour, Infrastructure
 
#Digital Humanities: Is Bigger, Better?
 
#Digital Humanities: Is Bigger, Better?
Margins, Mainstreams and the Mission of Digital Humanities
+
#Margins, Mainstreams and the Mission of Digital Humanities
 
#The Big Bang of Online Reading
 
#The Big Bang of Online Reading
 
#Getting There form Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities
 
#Getting There form Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities

Latest revision as of 09:47, 23 April 2019



Summary

Four parts: Transforming Disciplines, Media Methods, Critical Curation, and Research Futures

Useful Content

Table of Contents

  1. Collecting Ourselves
  2. Exercises in Battology: Digitizing Samuel Beckett's 'Watt
  3. Stylometry of Dickens's Language: An Experiment with Random Forests
  4. Patterns and Trends in Harlequin Category Romances
  5. The Printers' Web: New Tools to Crack Old Chestnuts
  6. Bibliographical Dictionaries in the Digital Era
  7. Digital Methods in New Cinema History
  8. A 'Big Data' Approach to Mapping the Australian Twittersphere
  9. iResearch: What do Smartphones Tell Us about the Digital Human
  10. Screenshots as Virtual Photography: Cybernetics, Remediation, and Affect
  11. Rethinking Collections
  12. Methods and Canons: An Interdisciplinary Excursion
  13. Reading the Text, Walking the Terrain, Following the Map: Do We See the Same Landscape?
  14. Doing the Sheep Good: Facilitating Engagement in Digital Humanities and Creative Arts Research
  15. Materialities of Software: Logistics, Labour, Infrastructure
  16. Digital Humanities: Is Bigger, Better?
  17. Margins, Mainstreams and the Mission of Digital Humanities
  18. The Big Bang of Online Reading
  19. Getting There form Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities

Review

  • The first two parts seem a bit randomly put together, not sure if it would be useful.
  • The last section on Research Futures should be looked at in more detail, along with some of the chapters in the Critical Curation section.