Difference between revisions of "Resource: Interdisciplining Digital Humanities"
From Lyndsey Twining
(Created page with "{{Resource | title = Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field | author1 = Klein, Julie Thompson | year = 2015 | publisher = University of Mich...") |
(→Review) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Useful Content== | ==Useful Content== | ||
| + | p 15 | ||
| + | *"'' Multidisciplinarity (MD)'' is characterized by juxtaposition of separate disciplinary inputs. Juxtaposition fosters breadth of knowledge and diversity of approaches. Yet, they are typically aligned or in encyclopedia order at best. Inputs are not integrated around core questions, topics, themes, or problems. Individuals also remain anchored in their respective expertise, and collaboration is lacking." | ||
| + | *"''Interdisciplinarity (ID)'' is typically characterized by integration of information, data, methods, tools, concepts, and/or theories from two or more disciplines or bodies of specialized knowledge. Proactive focusing, blending, and linking of disciplinary inputs foster a more holistic understanding of a question, topic, theme, or problems by individuals or teams. | ||
| + | p 17 | ||
| + | * ''Methodological ID'' typically improves the quality of results, by using a method, concept, or tool from a another discipline in order to test a hypothesis, to answer a research question, or to help develop a theory. In contrast ''Theoretical ID'' develops a more comprehensive general view, typically in the form of new conceptual frameworks of synthesis." | ||
| + | |||
| + | p 18 | ||
| + | *"''Instrumental ID'' typically aims at creating a product or meeting a designated pragmatic need. In contrast, ''Critical ID'' interrogates the domanicate structure of knowledge and education with the aim of transforming the. | ||
| + | |||
| + | p 20 | ||
| + | *"''Transdisciplinarity'' transcends the narrow scope of disciplinary worldviews through an overarching synthesis associated with new conceptual frameworks or paradigms and, in a more recent connotation, problem-oriented research involving stakeholders in society." | ||
==Table of Contents== | ==Table of Contents== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 37: | ||
==Review== | ==Review== | ||
| − | + | *Chapter 1 will be useful in situating my research from a theoretical perspective. It provides vocabulary with which to explain the the perspective from which my research operates. | |
| + | *Chapter 5 on Educating is also very useful to find ways to approach DH education. | ||
| + | *Chapter 6 has many great resources for further study. | ||
[[Category:Resource]] | [[Category:Resource]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 17 April 2019
| Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field | |
| Title | Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field |
|---|---|
| Author/Editor | Klein, Julie Thompson |
| Year | 2015 |
| Publisher | University of Michigan Press |
| Pages | 201 |
Summary
Useful Content
p 15
- " Multidisciplinarity (MD) is characterized by juxtaposition of separate disciplinary inputs. Juxtaposition fosters breadth of knowledge and diversity of approaches. Yet, they are typically aligned or in encyclopedia order at best. Inputs are not integrated around core questions, topics, themes, or problems. Individuals also remain anchored in their respective expertise, and collaboration is lacking."
- "Interdisciplinarity (ID) is typically characterized by integration of information, data, methods, tools, concepts, and/or theories from two or more disciplines or bodies of specialized knowledge. Proactive focusing, blending, and linking of disciplinary inputs foster a more holistic understanding of a question, topic, theme, or problems by individuals or teams.
p 17
- Methodological ID typically improves the quality of results, by using a method, concept, or tool from a another discipline in order to test a hypothesis, to answer a research question, or to help develop a theory. In contrast Theoretical ID develops a more comprehensive general view, typically in the form of new conceptual frameworks of synthesis."
p 18
- "Instrumental ID typically aims at creating a product or meeting a designated pragmatic need. In contrast, Critical ID interrogates the domanicate structure of knowledge and education with the aim of transforming the.
p 20
- "Transdisciplinarity transcends the narrow scope of disciplinary worldviews through an overarching synthesis associated with new conceptual frameworks or paradigms and, in a more recent connotation, problem-oriented research involving stakeholders in society."
Table of Contents
Introduction, Emerging
- Interdisciplining
- Defining
- Institutionalizing
- Professionalizing
- Educating
- Collaborating and Rewarding
Resourcing
Review
- Chapter 1 will be useful in situating my research from a theoretical perspective. It provides vocabulary with which to explain the the perspective from which my research operates.
- Chapter 5 on Educating is also very useful to find ways to approach DH education.
- Chapter 6 has many great resources for further study.