Difference between revisions of "Resource: Advancing Digital Humanities"
From Lyndsey Twining
(Created page with "{{Resource | title = | author1 = | year = | publisher = | pages = | photo = }} ==Summary== ==Useful Content== ==Table of Contents== ==Review== Category:Resource") |
(→Table of Contents) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
− | | title = | + | | title = Advancing Digital Humanities - Research, Methods, Theories |
− | | author1 = | + | | author1 = Arthur, Paul Longley & Katherine Bode (Eds.) |
− | | year = | + | | year = 2014 |
− | | publisher = | + | | publisher = Palgrave Macmillan |
| pages = | | pages = | ||
| photo = | | photo = | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
− | + | Four parts: Transforming Disciplines, Media Methods, Critical Curation, and Research Futures | |
==Useful Content== | ==Useful Content== | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Table of Contents== | ==Table of Contents== | ||
− | + | #Collecting Ourselves | |
+ | #Exercises in Battology: Digitizing Samuel Beckett's 'Watt'' | ||
+ | #Stylometry of Dickens's Language: An Experiment with Random Forests | ||
+ | #Patterns and Trends in Harlequin Category Romances | ||
+ | #The Printers' Web: New Tools to Crack Old Chestnuts | ||
+ | #Bibliographical Dictionaries in the Digital Era | ||
+ | #Digital Methods in New Cinema History | ||
+ | #A 'Big Data' Approach to Mapping the Australian Twittersphere | ||
+ | #iResearch: What do Smartphones Tell Us about the Digital Human | ||
+ | #Screenshots as Virtual Photography: Cybernetics, Remediation, and Affect | ||
+ | #Rethinking Collections | ||
+ | #Methods and Canons: An Interdisciplinary Excursion | ||
+ | #Reading the Text, Walking the Terrain, Following the Map: Do We See the Same Landscape? | ||
+ | #Doing the Sheep Good: Facilitating Engagement in Digital Humanities and Creative Arts Research | ||
+ | #Materialities of Software: Logistics, Labour, Infrastructure | ||
+ | #Digital Humanities: Is Bigger, Better? | ||
+ | #Margins, Mainstreams and the Mission of Digital Humanities | ||
+ | #The Big Bang of Online Reading | ||
+ | #Getting There form Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities | ||
==Review== | ==Review== | ||
+ | *The first two parts seem a bit randomly put together, not sure if it would be useful. | ||
+ | *The last section on Research Futures should be looked at in more detail, along with some of the chapters in the Critical Curation section. | ||
[[Category:Resource]] | [[Category:Resource]] |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 23 April 2019
Advancing Digital Humanities - Research, Methods, Theories | |
Title | Advancing Digital Humanities - Research, Methods, Theories |
---|---|
Author/Editor | Arthur, Paul Longley & Katherine Bode (Eds.) |
Year | 2014 |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
Summary
Four parts: Transforming Disciplines, Media Methods, Critical Curation, and Research Futures
Useful Content
Table of Contents
- Collecting Ourselves
- Exercises in Battology: Digitizing Samuel Beckett's 'Watt
- Stylometry of Dickens's Language: An Experiment with Random Forests
- Patterns and Trends in Harlequin Category Romances
- The Printers' Web: New Tools to Crack Old Chestnuts
- Bibliographical Dictionaries in the Digital Era
- Digital Methods in New Cinema History
- A 'Big Data' Approach to Mapping the Australian Twittersphere
- iResearch: What do Smartphones Tell Us about the Digital Human
- Screenshots as Virtual Photography: Cybernetics, Remediation, and Affect
- Rethinking Collections
- Methods and Canons: An Interdisciplinary Excursion
- Reading the Text, Walking the Terrain, Following the Map: Do We See the Same Landscape?
- Doing the Sheep Good: Facilitating Engagement in Digital Humanities and Creative Arts Research
- Materialities of Software: Logistics, Labour, Infrastructure
- Digital Humanities: Is Bigger, Better?
- Margins, Mainstreams and the Mission of Digital Humanities
- The Big Bang of Online Reading
- Getting There form Here: Remembering the Future of Digital Humanities
Review
- The first two parts seem a bit randomly put together, not sure if it would be useful.
- The last section on Research Futures should be looked at in more detail, along with some of the chapters in the Critical Curation section.