"(Translation) 蕩平碑"의 두 판 사이의 차이
(→Translation) |
|||
| 46번째 줄: | 46번째 줄: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
To be broad-minded and not take sides is the public-mindedness of a gentleman. To take sides and not be broad-minded is the selfish intention of a petty man. | To be broad-minded and not take sides is the public-mindedness of a gentleman. To take sides and not be broad-minded is the selfish intention of a petty man. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 2 : Irina'''=== | ==='''Student 2 : Irina'''=== | ||
| 53번째 줄: | 55번째 줄: | ||
Those who make troubles is not open-minded | Those who make troubles is not open-minded | ||
He is devoted to his selfish aim. | He is devoted to his selfish aim. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 3 : Masha'''=== | ==='''Student 3 : Masha'''=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Document 2 All-embracing and not partial is a public mindedness of a morally upright person. Partial and not all-embracing is a selfish interest of a petty person. | Document 2 All-embracing and not partial is a public mindedness of a morally upright person. Partial and not all-embracing is a selfish interest of a petty person. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 4 : Jong Woo Park'''=== | ==='''Student 4 : Jong Woo Park'''=== | ||
| 63번째 줄: | 69번째 줄: | ||
Boundlessness and nonpartisan-ness are the characteristics of the superior men's public mindedness; partisan-ness and bounded are the characteristics of the lesser men's selfishness. | Boundlessness and nonpartisan-ness are the characteristics of the superior men's public mindedness; partisan-ness and bounded are the characteristics of the lesser men's selfishness. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 5 : Kanghun Ahn'''=== | ==='''Student 5 : Kanghun Ahn'''=== | ||
| 68번째 줄: | 76번째 줄: | ||
The public-mindedness of the morally refined is to be universal, and not lopsided, | The public-mindedness of the morally refined is to be universal, and not lopsided, | ||
The private interest of the narrow-minded is lopsided, and not universal. | The private interest of the narrow-minded is lopsided, and not universal. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 6 : Hu Jing'''=== | ==='''Student 6 : Hu Jing'''=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
The public mind of a superior man is to be catholic but not partisan; while the selfishness of a mean person is the contrary behavior. | The public mind of a superior man is to be catholic but not partisan; while the selfishness of a mean person is the contrary behavior. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 7 : King Kwong Wong'''=== | ==='''Student 7 : King Kwong Wong'''=== | ||
| 77번째 줄: | 89번째 줄: | ||
To be inclusive and not to be partisan is the public-mindedness of righteous men. | To be inclusive and not to be partisan is the public-mindedness of righteous men. | ||
To be partisan and not to be inclusive is the selfish intent of lowly persons. | To be partisan and not to be inclusive is the selfish intent of lowly persons. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 8 : Zhijun Ren'''=== | ==='''Student 8 : Zhijun Ren'''=== | ||
| 83번째 줄: | 97번째 줄: | ||
To reach everyone evenly and equally without getting intimate with a particular one is the public-mindedness of a superior man. | To reach everyone evenly and equally without getting intimate with a particular one is the public-mindedness of a superior man. | ||
To get intimate with a particular one without reaching out evenly is the private interest of a lesser mean man. | To get intimate with a particular one without reaching out evenly is the private interest of a lesser mean man. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 9 : Write your name'''=== | ==='''Student 9 : Write your name'''=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| 94번째 줄: | 112번째 줄: | ||
比而弗周 寔小人之私意 | 比而弗周 寔小人之私意 | ||
Partial and not well-rounded is the mean man’s self-serving intent. | Partial and not well-rounded is the mean man’s self-serving intent. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 11 : Write your name'''=== | ==='''Student 11 : Write your name'''=== | ||
| 100번째 줄: | 120번째 줄: | ||
The virtuous man is open-minded and not factious. | The virtuous man is open-minded and not factious. | ||
The mean man is factious and not open-minded. | The mean man is factious and not open-minded. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 12 : Write your name'''=== | ==='''Student 12 : Write your name'''=== | ||
| 105번째 줄: | 127번째 줄: | ||
Being inclusive and not partisan is the public-mindedness of the superior persons. | Being inclusive and not partisan is the public-mindedness of the superior persons. | ||
Not being inclusive and being partisan is the selfish mind of the mean persons. | Not being inclusive and being partisan is the selfish mind of the mean persons. | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
| + | |||
==='''Student 13 : Write your name'''=== | ==='''Student 13 : Write your name'''=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
==='''Student 14 : Write your name'''=== | ==='''Student 14 : Write your name'''=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Discussion Questions: | ||
=='''Further Readings'''== | =='''Further Readings'''== | ||
2017년 7월 5일 (수) 07:28 판
| Primary Source | ||
|---|---|---|
 |
Title | |
| English | ||
| Chinese | 蕩平碑 | |
| Korean(RR) | 탕평비(Tangpyeongbi) | |
| Text Details | ||
| Genre | Royal Documents | |
| Type | ||
| Author(s) | King Yeongjo | |
| Year | 1742 | |
| Source | ||
| Key Concepts | King Yeongjo, | |
| Translation Info | ||
| Translator(s) | Participants of 2017 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group) | |
| Editor(s) | ||
| Year | 2017 | |
I-1. 御製問業 어제문업(Eoje munup) 1774
I-3. 御製均役濬川卽予事業 어제균역준천즉여사업(Eoje gyunyeokjuncheonjeugyeosaeop) 1773
I-4. 御製壹初 어제일초(Eoje ilcho) 1774
I-5. 御製垂綸吟 어제수윤음(Eoje suyuneum) 1774
I-6. 御製廣蕩 어제광탕(Eoje gwangtang) 1774
목차
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Original Script
- 3 Translation
- 3.1 Student 1 : Kim Young
- 3.2 Student 2 : Irina
- 3.3 Student 3 : Masha
- 3.4 Student 4 : Jong Woo Park
- 3.5 Student 5 : Kanghun Ahn
- 3.6 Student 6 : Hu Jing
- 3.7 Student 7 : King Kwong Wong
- 3.8 Student 8 : Zhijun Ren
- 3.9 Student 9 : Write your name
- 3.10 Student 10 : Martin Gehlmann
- 3.11 Student 11 : Write your name
- 3.12 Student 12 : Write your name
- 3.13 Student 13 : Write your name
- 3.14 Student 14 : Write your name
- 4 Further Readings
Introduction
Original Script
| Classical Chinese | English |
|---|---|
|
周而弗比 乃君子之公心 |
(Translation) |
Translation
Student 1 : Kim Young
To be broad-minded and not take sides is the public-mindedness of a gentleman. To take sides and not be broad-minded is the selfish intention of a petty man.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 2 : Irina
Those who is open-minded does not make troubles The noble man is devoted to the public interests. Those who make troubles is not open-minded He is devoted to his selfish aim.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 3 : Masha
Document 2 All-embracing and not partial is a public mindedness of a morally upright person. Partial and not all-embracing is a selfish interest of a petty person.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 4 : Jong Woo Park
Document #2
Boundlessness and nonpartisan-ness are the characteristics of the superior men's public mindedness; partisan-ness and bounded are the characteristics of the lesser men's selfishness.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 5 : Kanghun Ahn
The public-mindedness of the morally refined is to be universal, and not lopsided, The private interest of the narrow-minded is lopsided, and not universal.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 6 : Hu Jing
The public mind of a superior man is to be catholic but not partisan; while the selfishness of a mean person is the contrary behavior.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 7 : King Kwong Wong
To be inclusive and not to be partisan is the public-mindedness of righteous men. To be partisan and not to be inclusive is the selfish intent of lowly persons.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 8 : Zhijun Ren
To reach everyone evenly and equally without getting intimate with a particular one is the public-mindedness of a superior man. To get intimate with a particular one without reaching out evenly is the private interest of a lesser mean man.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 9 : Write your name
- Discussion Questions:
Student 10 : Martin Gehlmann
周而弗比 乃君子之公心 Well-rounded and not partial is the high-minded man’s public spirit 比而弗周 寔小人之私意 Partial and not well-rounded is the mean man’s self-serving intent.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 11 : Write your name
Document 2 The virtuous man is open-minded and not factious. The mean man is factious and not open-minded.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 12 : Write your name
Being inclusive and not partisan is the public-mindedness of the superior persons. Not being inclusive and being partisan is the selfish mind of the mean persons.
- Discussion Questions:
Student 13 : Write your name
- Discussion Questions:
Student 14 : Write your name
- Discussion Questions:
