"(Translation) 1801年 李希誠 衿給文記"의 두 판 사이의 차이

2018년 7월 12일 (목) 12:48 판

Primary Source
	Title
	English
	Chinese	1801年 李希誠 衿給文記
	Korean(RR)	1801년 이희성 깃급문기 (Yi Hui-seong gis-geub-mun-gi)
	Text Details
	Genre	Social Life and Economic Strategies
	Type	Record
	Author(s)	李希誠
	Year	1801
	Source
	Key Concepts	Master-slave Compact
	Translation Info
	Translator(s)	Participants of 2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group)
	Editor(s)
	Year	2018

Introduction

Original Script

Discussion Questions

Further Readings

References

1. ↑ ‘契谷’은 契員이 出資한 곡식으로서 ‘契穀’이 맞으나 음가가 같으므로 ‘谷’자로도 흔히 사용하였다.
2. ↑ 畓二斗落=600坪(1斗落=300坪, 1坪 =3.3058㎡)=1,983.48㎡=0.49ac(1ac=4,047㎡)

Translation

(sample) : Jaeyoon Song

• Discussion Questions:

Student 1 : (Write your name)

old document, slavery-slave compact, economic and social status of slaves , property distribution

• Discussion Questions:

Is all these documents written by the owner of the slaves themselves or by someone at a specific position? How are they going to ensure the legality of these compact?

Student 2 : (Write your name)

key words: slaves, master, compact, land, property, descendants social history, social mobility, tenant farmers,

• Discussion Questions:

What were the significances of the abolishment of 從賤法 and establishment of 從良法?

Student 3 : Hu JIng

• key words: yangban-nobi relation, economic life in Joseon, compact, social mobility in Joseon

• Discussion Questions:

1. What can we learn from this document with regard to the relation between the yangban and nobi in Joseon dynasty, particularly when thinking of that the slavery system was under transition at the point?

Student 4 : Martin

Inheritance Practices, Transformation of Korean slavery system

• Discussion Questions:

1. What does the document tell about the economical costs and value of slavery?

2. Following the contents of the document describing the inheritance of the compact between slaves and master, who actually benefited from the establishment of the contract?

Student 5 : Inho Choi

Master-Slave compact, Inheritance, Choson Slavery, Choson social history, Social Mobility

• Discussion Questions:

Is 契 a financial arrangement, a legal document, or both. Is 契 a exclusively private arrangement, or does government somehow guarantee its effect and helps its enforcement? Is there any shift in the meaning of 奴 in the early 19th century that allows them to make a compact with their master?

Student 6 : Kanghun Ahn

Choson social history, inheritance, property distribution, Korean slavery,

• Discussion Questions: How many 奴主契 documents can be found from the Choson dynasty? Was it kind of a common practice? And what sort of sociopolitical significance (or implication) does it have on Choson social history as a whole?

Student 7 : King Kwong Wong

• Keywords:

economic and social relationship between master and slaves, changing social condition, hereditary status of slaves

• Discussion Questions:

1. How does this document reveal the relationship between master and slaves?
2. How does this document tell about the status of slaves during the Joseon period?
3. For what purposes, do both parties have this kind of agreement?
4. What does this document tell us about the social condition of the time?

Student 8 : Younès M'Ghari

• Key Concepts:

Chosôn, social history, legacy transmission, contract between slaves and the master

• Discussion Questions:

Could the clauses of this contract be in conflict with the ones of the former slave contracts (there is no mention of "this contract hereby cancels the previous contract")? How would the author of this contract avoid such issues?

How would the slaves understand the contract if it is written in Korean Literary Sinitic language?

Student 9 : (Mengheng Lee)

• keyword:

slavery, the social status system, and social mobility in Chosŏn Korea, slave-master compact, and documents of distribution of property.

• Discussion Questions:

1. To what extent could we say that this document shows the increased social mobility in Chosŏn Korea?

2. What is the nature of slave-master compact that we can conceptualize from this document?

3. What's the historical significance of this document?

Student 10 : (Ji-Hyun Lee)

奴主契 slave-master compact,

奴婢 slavery

宗家 head-family

分財記 inheritance document

land and property distribution

Chosŏn contract

• Discussion Questions:

1. How would the inheritance of the 2 durak be changed in case of the demographic changes among the slaves, ex. more children in one slave's house whereas no children in the other's?

2. From where did the slaves employ the substitute laborers to fix the walls and to be paid?

3. How are the slaves in Korea different from serfs or peasants in European feudalism?

Student 11 : Lee Goeun

• Discussion Questions: Since when such compact between master and slaves began to appear in Joseon? Was this common in the society? Was there a regional difference or tendency?
• Key Concepts: Changing social strata in the turn to 19c Joseon

Student 12 : Sanghoon Na

• Discussion Questions:

How does Huiseong Yi rationalize/justify his distributing property to only his son?

How does 奴婢從母法 confirmed in the seventh year of King Yeongjo's reign(1731) affect this document issued in 1801?

• Key Concepts: Slave-master compact, mutual discussion

Student 13 : (Write your name)

• Discussion Questions:

Student 14 : (Write your name)

• Discussion Questions: