(Translation) 東史綱目 序

From 장서각위키
Jump to: navigation, search


Introduction

Original Script

Classical Chinese English

東方史亦備矣。紀傳則有金文烈,鄭文成之三國高麗史。編年則徐四佳,崔錦南奉敎撰通鑑。因是而兪氏提綱,林氏會綱作焉。抄節則有權氏史畧,吳氏撰要等書。彬彬然盛矣。然而三國史踈畧而爽實。高麗史繁冗而寡要。通鑑義例多舛。提綱,會綱筆法或乖。至於因謬襲誤。以訛傳訛。諸書等爾。鼎福讀之慨然。遂有刊正之意。博取東史及中史之有及于東事者。一遵紫陽成法。彙成一帙。以爲私室巾衍之藏。資其考閱而已。非敢以撰述自居也。大抵史家大法。明統系也。嚴簒賊也。褒忠節也。正是非也。詳典章也。諸史於此。實多可議。故一皆釐正。而至若訛謬之甚者。別爲附錄二卷。系之于下。書成二十餘年。久未繕寫。丙申冬。承乏湖邑。簿領之暇。書一本。因述其由。用授家塾子弟。

東史綱目 序동사강목 서 Preface to Annotated Account of Eastern History

One of the most representative historical works written during the second half of the Joseon

Chronological history 편년체 編年體

By 安鼎福 안정복 An, Chong-bok (1712-1791)

The title after 資治通鑑綱目 Chach’it’onggam kangmok by Zhu Xi 朱熹(1130-1200) and followed the manner and format

An, Chong-bok, first professional historian of late Joseon, scholar of Silhak 實學, Neo-Confucian, follower of Seongho (星湖) Yi Ik李瀷 (1681-1763)
Self-concious and evidential approach to Korean history

- From Gija 기자(箕子) to the end of Goryo 고려(高麗) (918-1392)
- Gija vs Tan’gun Joseon, view on Wiman, territorial concerns
- Special attention to Koreans’ resistance to foreign invasions in the earlier period, view on Catholics
- View on slavery

  • Discussion Questions:


Further Readings