"GGHS 2019 Winter - Team 5"의 두 판 사이의 차이

DH 교육용 위키
이동: 둘러보기, 검색
31번째 줄: 31번째 줄:
 
===2) 조약내용===
 
===2) 조약내용===
  
==1.2 강화도 조약의 인권침해 사례==
+
==1.2 A case of extraterritorial damage==
 +
 
 +
1) In  November 1908, a Japanese man hit a Korean named Kim Won-baek with a stone and put him in an emergency situation.  The police made Kim Won-baek receive treatment for seven days and made the criminal pay for the treatment charge.
 +
          -  A magazine report dated November 20, 1908. 「日打衛표」.
 +
 
 +
2) The Japanese set up an illegal circus on the street and stole the money of a foolish Korean. This should be banned by the law enforcement authorities. Despite that, the Japanese police often overlooked these cases.           
 +
  - A magazine report dated Nov. 14, 1906, 「日技不禁」
 +
 
 +
3) Japanese citizens Yang Sang-Taero(陽上太郞) and Masuichi Kimura (木村政一)  went to the province to collect gamble debt money and got drunk at Kang Myong-son’s home, behaving rudely and causing troubles.
 +
When Jiang Yun, who lived next door, could not control his anger and tried to restrain them, the Japanese beat him with a stake. Then his younger brothers Kang Yun-chil and Kang Geum-Seon tied Yang Sang-Taero up in anger and beat him, breaking his teeth.
 +
Kang Yun-chil and Kang Geum-seon were sentenced to five and four months in prison respectively by the local Korean court. On the other hand, the Japanese were not punished.  Japanese who started this first, and only Koreans who tried to stop them were punished.The reporter at the time lamented,  ' Where is the law of disrespect in the family. The resentment of both parties reached its highest point.'
 +
a magazine report dated August 30, 1906, 「飄 可 宪」 .
 +
 
 
==1.3 Comparative analysis between public opinion during colonial times and present press==
 
==1.3 Comparative analysis between public opinion during colonial times and present press==
 
===1) 강화도 조약 후 위정척사파와 개화파가 나뉜 이유===
 
===1) 강화도 조약 후 위정척사파와 개화파가 나뉜 이유===

2019년 1월 3일 (목) 17:16 판

2018GGHS.png

Treaty of Ganghwa Island and some human rights violation cases during the colonial times in Korea - focused on press reports

Team

No. Team Topic Teacher Role Name (Korean) No. of Students
5 Human Rights and Media during the Colonial Period
(일제 강점기 인권과 언론)
Evelyn RUIZ Leader 문지○ 9
Vice-Leader 한가○
김해○
송세○
이다○
최하○
김바○
오지○
이유○


1. Treaty of Ganghwa Island

1.1 강화도 조약의 내용

1) 기본정보

2) 조약내용

1.2 A case of extraterritorial damage

1) In November 1908, a Japanese man hit a Korean named Kim Won-baek with a stone and put him in an emergency situation. The police made Kim Won-baek receive treatment for seven days and made the criminal pay for the treatment charge.

         -  A magazine report dated November 20, 1908. 「日打衛표」.

2) The Japanese set up an illegal circus on the street and stole the money of a foolish Korean. This should be banned by the law enforcement authorities. Despite that, the Japanese police often overlooked these cases.

 - A magazine report dated Nov. 14, 1906, 「日技不禁」

3) Japanese citizens Yang Sang-Taero(陽上太郞) and Masuichi Kimura (木村政一) went to the province to collect gamble debt money and got drunk at Kang Myong-son’s home, behaving rudely and causing troubles. When Jiang Yun, who lived next door, could not control his anger and tried to restrain them, the Japanese beat him with a stake. Then his younger brothers Kang Yun-chil and Kang Geum-Seon tied Yang Sang-Taero up in anger and beat him, breaking his teeth. Kang Yun-chil and Kang Geum-seon were sentenced to five and four months in prison respectively by the local Korean court. On the other hand, the Japanese were not punished. Japanese who started this first, and only Koreans who tried to stop them were punished.The reporter at the time lamented, ' Where is the law of disrespect in the family. The resentment of both parties reached its highest point.' a magazine report dated August 30, 1906, 「飄 可 宪」 .

1.3 Comparative analysis between public opinion during colonial times and present press

1) 강화도 조약 후 위정척사파와 개화파가 나뉜 이유

2) 당시 여론들의 입장과 대표 인물들

3)현재 언론의 진보세력, 보수세력

2. 일제강점기의 인권유린과 언론

2.1 인권유린사례

1) The military police system

-An immediate penalty and Joseon flogging command

The military police system: During the period of rule without permission, Japan imposed coercive rule based on the military police system. The military police system was the security system that Japan enforced in Joseon in the 1910s and was at the core of the rule of law. Military police and police offices across the country were set up to monitor the daily lives of Koreans and violate the basic human principles of freedom and social rights. In other words, the military police had to do with politics, economy, school, sanitation, and even intervened in the planning and deliberation of administrative operations and administrative affairs.

-Joseon flogging command The Japanese government enacted a law that allowed Joseon people to be arrested arbitrarily without physical certificates or an official trial to be sentenced to death under the pretext of maintaining public peace, and is It was applied differently only to Koreans. Based on this, the Japanese government used it as a means to attract and torture independence activists and anti-Japanese historians.

-a few provision One. “Lay the prisoner down on the template, tie his arms and legs on the template, take off his pants, and strike his thighs with a rod..” Two. “A beverage can be prepared and given to the prisoner from sometime (meaning pouring if someone faint)”. twelve. “If there is the prisoner crying during execution, cover his mouth with a wet towel.”

Oh Myung Chun (an anti-Japanese activist)’s testimony

‘When a person lie flat on the template, he drilled a hole in the direction of the genitals, opened his arms and tied his legs and waist. When put lead on the end of the ukyeonga (hawk made of cow's penis) and hit your thigh, the lead penetrates into the flesh, and blood flows. The hawk is in its first 80s, and if it fainted midway, it will save it and hit it again three days later.”

-An immediate penalty The immediate penalty is to give the right of summary judgment to exercise the suppression of fines, malpractices and detention on Koreans to a police chief or a military police captain. The content was that the chief of police or the head of the military police force in each province would be sentenced to three months in prison and a fine of 100 million won or less without trial by the court.

2) 강제징용과 위안부

3) 조선어 사용 금지

4) 언론보도

2.2 언론탄압

References

Gallery

Map(s)

Network Graph(s)

References