양혜왕 상편 01장 - 편집 역사

Aks류인태: /* 원문 */

2016-11-28T07:16:02Z

‎원문

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:15에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:15:44Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:15에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:15:00Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:14에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:14:34Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:14에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:14:15Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:13에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:13:47Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:12에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:12:56Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:12에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:12:39Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:12에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:12:10Z

2016년 11월 28일 (월) 07:11에 대한 Aks류인태의 편집

2016-11-28T07:11:45Z

@@ 6번째 줄: / 6번째 줄: @@
 #孟子見梁惠王.
 #王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
-#孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
+#孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有仁義而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
 </big>
 <br/><br/>

@@ 4번째 줄: / 4번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-#孟子見梁惠王.<br/>
+#孟子見梁惠王.
-#王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"<br/>
+#王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
 #孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
 </big>
@@ 17번째 줄: / 17번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-#Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.<br/>
+#Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.
-#The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"<br/>
+#The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"
-#Mencius replied, "Why must your Majesty use that word 'profit?' What I am provided with, are counsels to benevolence and righteousness, and these are my only topics. If your Majesty say, 'What is to be done to profit my kingdom?' the great officers will say, 'What is to be done to profit our families?' and the inferior officers and the common people will say, 'What is to be done to profit our persons?' Superiors and inferiors will try to snatch this profit the one from the other, and the kingdom will be endangered. In the kingdom of ten thousand chariots, the murderer of his sovereign shall be the chief of a family of a thousand chariots. In the kingdom of a thousand chariots, the murderer of his prince shall be the chief of a family of a hundred chariots. To have a thousand in ten thousand, and a hundred in a thousand, cannot be said not to be a large allotment, but if righteousness be put last, and profit be put first, they will not be satisfied without snatching all. There never has been a benevolent man who neglected his parents. There never has been a righteous man who made his sovereign an after consideration. Let your Majesty also say, 'Benevolence and righteousness, and let these be your only themes.' Why must you use that word -- 'profit?'.
+#Mencius replied, "Why must your Majesty use that word 'profit?' What I am provided with, are counsels to benevolence and righteousness, and these are my only topics. If your Majesty say, 'What is to be done to profit my kingdom?' the great officers will say, 'What is to be done to profit our families?' and the inferior officers and the common people will say, 'What is to be done to profit our persons?' Superiors and inferiors will try to snatch this profit the one from the other, and the kingdom will be endangered. In the kingdom of ten thousand chariots, the murderer of his sovereign shall be the chief of a family of a thousand chariots. In the kingdom of a thousand chariots, the murderer of his prince shall be the chief of a family of a hundred chariots. To have a thousand in ten thousand, and a hundred in a thousand, cannot be said not to be a large allotment, but if righteousness be put last, and profit be put first, they will not be satisfied without snatching all. There never has been a benevolent man who neglected his parents. There never has been a righteous man who made his sovereign an after consideration. Let your Majesty also say, 'Benevolence and righteousness, and let these be your only themes.' Why must you use that word -- 'profit'?"
 </big>
 <br/><br/>

@@ 4번째 줄: / 4번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-#孟子見梁惠王.
+#孟子見梁惠王.<br/>
-#王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
+#王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"<br/>
 #孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
 </big>
@@ 17번째 줄: / 17번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-#Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.
+#Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.<br/>
-#The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"
+#The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"<br/>
 #Mencius replied, "Why must your Majesty use that word 'profit?' What I am provided with, are counsels to benevolence and righteousness, and these are my only topics. If your Majesty say, 'What is to be done to profit my kingdom?' the great officers will say, 'What is to be done to profit our families?' and the inferior officers and the common people will say, 'What is to be done to profit our persons?' Superiors and inferiors will try to snatch this profit the one from the other, and the kingdom will be endangered. In the kingdom of ten thousand chariots, the murderer of his sovereign shall be the chief of a family of a thousand chariots. In the kingdom of a thousand chariots, the murderer of his prince shall be the chief of a family of a hundred chariots. To have a thousand in ten thousand, and a hundred in a thousand, cannot be said not to be a large allotment, but if righteousness be put last, and profit be put first, they will not be satisfied without snatching all. There never has been a benevolent man who neglected his parents. There never has been a righteous man who made his sovereign an after consideration. Let your Majesty also say, 'Benevolence and righteousness, and let these be your only themes.' Why must you use that word -- 'profit?'.
 </big>

@@ 17번째 줄: / 17번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-# Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.
+#Mencius went to see king Hûi of Liang.
 #The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"
-# The king said, "Venerable sir, since you have not counted it far to come here, a distance of a thousand lî, may I presume that you are provided with counsels to profit my kingdom?"
+#Mencius replied, "Why must your Majesty use that word 'profit?' What I am provided with, are counsels to benevolence and righteousness, and these are my only topics. If your Majesty say, 'What is to be done to profit my kingdom?' the great officers will say, 'What is to be done to profit our families?' and the inferior officers and the common people will say, 'What is to be done to profit our persons?' Superiors and inferiors will try to snatch this profit the one from the other, and the kingdom will be endangered. In the kingdom of ten thousand chariots, the murderer of his sovereign shall be the chief of a family of a thousand chariots. In the kingdom of a thousand chariots, the murderer of his prince shall be the chief of a family of a hundred chariots. To have a thousand in ten thousand, and a hundred in a thousand, cannot be said not to be a large allotment, but if righteousness be put last, and profit be put first, they will not be satisfied without snatching all. There never has been a benevolent man who neglected his parents. There never has been a righteous man who made his sovereign an after consideration. Let your Majesty also say, 'Benevolence and righteousness, and let these be your only themes.' Why must you use that word -- 'profit?'.
-−
 # Mencius replied, "Why must your Majesty use that word 'profit?' What I am provided with, are counsels to benevolence and righteousness, and these are my only topics. If your Majesty say, 'What is to be done to profit my kingdom?' the great officers will say, 'What is to be done to profit our families?' and the inferior officers and the common people will say, 'What is to be done to profit our persons?' Superiors and inferiors will try to snatch this profit the one from the other, and the kingdom will be endangered. In the kingdom of ten thousand chariots, the murderer of his sovereign shall be the chief of a family of a thousand chariots. In the kingdom of a thousand chariots, the murderer of his prince shall be the chief of a family of a hundred chariots. To have a thousand in ten thousand, and a hundred in a thousand, cannot be said not to be a large allotment, but if righteousness be put last, and profit be put first, they will not be satisfied without snatching all. There never has been a benevolent man who neglected his parents. There never has been a righteous man who made his sovereign an after consideration. Let your Majesty also say, 'Benevolence and righteousness, and let these be your only themes.' Why must you use that word -- 'profit?'.
 </big>
 <br/><br/>

@@ 4번째 줄: / 4번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-# 孟子見梁惠王.
+#孟子見梁惠王.
 #王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
-# 王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
+#孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
-−
 # 孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
 </big>
 <br/><br/>

@@ 4번째 줄: / 4번째 줄: @@
 <br/>
 <big>
-孟子見<ins>梁惠王</ins><ref><big>'''梁惠王''' : 梁惠王, 魏侯罃也. 都大梁, 僭稱王. 諡,曰 惠. 史記惠王三十五年, 卑禮厚幣, 以招賢者, 而孟軻至梁.</big></ref>.
+孟子見梁惠王.
-王曰, "<ins>叟</ins>! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以<ins>利</ins>吾國乎?"
+王曰, "叟! 不遠千里而來, 亦將有以利吾國乎?"
 孟子對曰, "王! 何必曰利? 亦有<ins>仁義</ins>而已矣. 王曰, ‘何以利吾國?’ 大夫曰, ‘何以利吾家?’ 士庶人曰, ‘何以利吾身?’上下交征利而國危矣. 萬乘之國, 弑其君者, 必千乘之家, 千乘之國, 弑其君者, 必百乘之家. 萬取千焉, 千取百焉, 不爲不多矣. 苟爲後義而先利, 不奪不饜. 未有仁而遺其親者也, 未有義而後其君者也. 王亦曰仁義而已矣, 何必曰利?"
@@ 31번째 줄: / 31번째 줄: @@
 <br clear="both"/>
-=='''集註'''==
+=='''주석'''==
 <references/>