Resource: Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Revision history

Admin: /* Review */

2019-04-17T07:51:09Z

‎Review

Admin: /* Useful Content */

2019-04-17T07:45:24Z

‎Useful Content

Admin: /* Useful Content */

2019-04-17T07:42:27Z

‎Useful Content

Admin: Created page with "{{Resource | title = Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field | author1 = Klein, Julie Thompson | year = 2015 | publisher = University of Mich..."

2019-04-17T07:33:03Z

Created page with "{{Resource | title = Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field | author1 = Klein, Julie Thompson | year = 2015 | publisher = University of Mich..."

New page

{{Resource
| title = Interdisciplining Digital Humanities - Boundary Work in an Emerging Field
| author1 = Klein, Julie Thompson
| year = 2015
| publisher = University of Michigan Press
| pages = 201
| photo =
}}

==Summary==

==Useful Content==

==Table of Contents==
Introduction, Emerging
# Interdisciplining
#Defining
#Institutionalizing
#Professionalizing
#Educating
#Collaborating and Rewarding
Resourcing

==Review==

[[Category:Resource]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 p 18
 *"''Instrumental ID'' typically aims at creating a product or meeting a designated pragmatic need. In contrast, ''Critical ID'' interrogates the domanicate structure of knowledge and education with the aim of transforming the.
 ==Table of Contents==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 17 April 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Useful Content==		==Useful Content==
		+	p 15
		+	*"'' Multidisciplinarity (MD)'' is characterized by juxtaposition of separate disciplinary inputs. Juxtaposition fosters breadth of knowledge and diversity of approaches. Yet, they are typically aligned or in encyclopedia order at best. Inputs are not integrated around core questions, topics, themes, or problems. Individuals also remain anchored in their respective expertise, and collaboration is lacking."
		+	*"''Interdisciplinarity (ID)'' is typically characterized by integration of information, data, methods, tools, concepts, and/or theories from two or more disciplines or bodies of specialized knowledge. Proactive focusing, blending, and linking of disciplinary inputs foster a more holistic understanding of a question, topic, theme, or problems by individuals or teams.

		+	p 17
		+	* ''Methodological ID'' typically improves the quality of results, by using a method, concept, or tool from a another discipline in order to test a hypothesis, to answer a research question, or to help develop a theory. In contrast ''Theoretical ID'' develops a more comprehensive general view, typically in the form of new conceptual frameworks of synthesis."
		+
		+	p 18
		+	*"''Instrumental ID'' typically aims at creating a product or meeting a designated pragmatic need. In contrast, ''Critical ID'' interrogates the domanicate structure of knowledge and education with the aim of transforming the.

	==Table of Contents==		==Table of Contents==

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 ==Review==
+*Chapter 1 will be useful in situating my research from a theoretical perspective. It provides vocabulary with which to explain the the perspective from which my research operates.
 [[Category:Resource]]