(2017Translation) 蝴蝶夢

장서각위키
Sanghoon Na (토론 | 기여) 사용자의 2017년 7월 6일 (목) 16:32 판

이동: 둘러보기, 검색


Original Script

昔者莊周夢為胡蝶,栩栩然胡蝶也,自喻適志與!不知周也。俄然覺,則蘧蘧然周也。不知周之夢為胡蝶與,胡蝶之夢為周與?周與胡蝶,則必有分矣。此之謂物化。 《莊子.齊物論》


Translation

Student 1 : Sanghoon Na

Formerly, Zhuang Zhou had a dream of becoming a butterfly, a happily fluttering[1] butterfly talking to himself "This is what I want!" He did not know that it was he. Suddenly he awoke, and then clearly realized[2] it was he. He did not know whether it was he dreaming of becoming a butterfly, or it was a butterfly dreaming of becoming him. [But] Between Zhou and a butterfly, there must be a distinction! This is called the "transitory character of things."[3] [4]


Footnotes

  1. 栩栩然 [註 165] 허허연(栩栩然) : 기뻐하는 모양. 세조실록 45권
  2. 蘧蘧然 [註 166] 거거연(籧籧然) : 스스로 깨닫는 모양. 세조실록 45권
  3. 物化 물화(物化): the transitory character of things (Charles Muller)
  4. 物化 물화(物化): the Transformation of Things (James Legge)

Student 2 : (Younès M'Ghari)


Once, Zhuang Zhou dreamt of being a butterfly, a fluttering butterfly. He himself was feeling very happy and could go wherever he wanted to. He did not know he was Zhou. He suddenly woke up and then was clearly Zhou. He did not know either it was Zhou dreaming of being a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming of being Zhou. If it is about Zhou and a butterfly, there should be a distinction. This is called the transformation into things.

Student 3 : (Write your name)



Student 4 : (Write your name)


Once Zhuangzi dreamt of being a butterfly, and like a butterfly, was flutteringly happy and carefree. [He] did not know he was Zhuangzi.

Suddenly he awoke, apparently Zhuangzi.

[He] did not know if he was Zhuangzi dreaming [of] being a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming [of] being Zhuangzi.

If [there is] a Zhuangzi and a butterfly, then there must be a distinction. This is called becoming a thing.

Student 5 : (Jae Yong Chang)


There was a man in the state of Chu who was selling a shield and a spear. (He was) proudly saying that my shield was so strong that nothing made it damaged. Saying again, my spear was also so sharp on anything that it’s impossible to be damaged. A person asked if you were to take your spear to strike your shield, what would it happen? Then he couldn’t be answered. Generally speaking, a shield that cannot be damaged and a spear that cannot be damaged, it cannot be in the same world and existed.

Student 6 : (Write your name)



Student 7 : (Write your name)



Student 8 : (Write your name)



Student 9 : (Write your name)



Student 10 : (Write your name)



Student 11 : (Write your name)



Student 12 : (Write your name)



Student 13 : Ra YeonJae


Student 14 : (Write your name)