2019 啓蒙篇 41 - 43 - 편집 역사

2019년 7월 17일 (수) 15:13에 Ewaddell님의 편집

2019-07-17T15:13:02Z

2019년 7월 17일 (수) 15:11에 Ewaddell님의 편집

2019-07-17T15:11:56Z

2019년 7월 17일 (수) 15:11에 Ewaddell님의 편집

2019-07-17T15:11:38Z

2019년 7월 17일 (수) 15:10에 Ewaddell님의 편집

2019-07-17T15:10:20Z

2019년 7월 17일 (수) 15:08에 Ewaddell님의 편집

2019-07-17T15:08:41Z

Youngoh64: /* Sentence 41 : Stella */

2019-07-17T14:26:24Z

‎Sentence 41 : Stella

Youngoh64: /* Sentence 42 : Stella */

2019-07-17T14:21:49Z

‎Sentence 42 : Stella

Stella Kim: /* Sentence 42 : Stella */

2019-07-17T13:58:39Z

‎Sentence 42 : Stella

Stella Kim: /* Sentence 42 : (name) */

2019-07-17T13:58:28Z

‎Sentence 42 : (name)

Stella Kim: /* Sentence 41 : (name) */

2019-07-17T13:49:04Z

‎Sentence 41 : (name)

@@ 100번째 줄: / 100번째 줄: @@
 體驗於吾心하여 得其一善하여 勉行之면
-and to verify manifestations [of principles/learning?] in my [one's?] mind; then having obtained the goodness of humans, if one diligently puts it into practice,
+and to verify manifestations [of principles/learning?] in one's mind; then having obtained the goodness of humans, if one diligently puts it into practice,
 則孝弟忠信之節이 自無不合於天叙之則矣라.

@@ 92번째 줄: / 92번째 줄: @@
 人非學問이면 固難知其何者가 爲孝며 何者가 爲忠이며 何者가 爲弟며 何者가 爲信
-If a person is not learned, indeed it is difficult for them to understand what it is to be: filial, loyal, brotherly, and trustworthy.<ref>A translation of this passage by Richard Rutt from 1960 that reads: "If a man does not study to learn, it is difficult for him to understand what are filial piety, loyalty, respect, and good faith. Therefore it is necessary to read books and probe reasons, to seek enlightenment from the men of [page 87] old, to make the body act according to the heart, and having obtained this one good thing to strive to live by it, that is to say; filial and brotherly piety, and good faith—which naturally accord with Heavenly order." See: Richard Rutt, "The Chinese Learning and Pleasures of a Country Scholar," ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch'' (Seoul: Korea Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, 1969): p. 86-7.</ref>
+If a person is not learned, indeed it is difficult for them to understand what it is to be: filial, loyal, brotherly, and trustworthy.<ref>A translation of this passage by Richard Rutt from 1960 reads: "If a man does not study to learn, it is difficult for him to understand what are filial piety, loyalty, respect, and good faith. Therefore it is necessary to read books and probe reasons, to seek enlightenment from the men of [page 87] old, to make the body act according to the heart, and having obtained this one good thing to strive to live by it, that is to say; filial and brotherly piety, and good faith—which naturally accord with Heavenly order." See: Richard Rutt, "The Chinese Learning and Pleasures of a Country Scholar," ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch'' (Seoul: Korea Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, 1969): p. 86-7.</ref>
 故로 必須讀書窮理하여 求觀於古人하며

@@ 92번째 줄: / 92번째 줄: @@
 人非學問이면 固難知其何者가 爲孝며 何者가 爲忠이며 何者가 爲弟며 何者가 爲信
-If a person is not learned, indeed it is difficult for them to understand what it is to be: filial, loyal, brotherly, and trustworthy.<ref>This sentence is translated by Richard Rutt as, "If a man does not study to learn, it is difficult for him to understand what are filial piety, loyalty, respect, and good faith. Therefore it is necessary to read books and probe reasons, to seek enlightenment from the men of [page 87] old, to make the body act according to the heart, and having obtained this one good thing to strive to live by it, that is to say; filial and brotherly piety, and good faith—which naturally accord with Heavenly order." See: Richard Rutt, "The Chinese Learning and Pleasures of a Country Scholar," ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch'' (Seoul: Korea Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, 1969): p. 86-7.</ref>
+If a person is not learned, indeed it is difficult for them to understand what it is to be: filial, loyal, brotherly, and trustworthy.<ref>A translation of this passage by Richard Rutt from 1960 that reads: "If a man does not study to learn, it is difficult for him to understand what are filial piety, loyalty, respect, and good faith. Therefore it is necessary to read books and probe reasons, to seek enlightenment from the men of [page 87] old, to make the body act according to the heart, and having obtained this one good thing to strive to live by it, that is to say; filial and brotherly piety, and good faith—which naturally accord with Heavenly order." See: Richard Rutt, "The Chinese Learning and Pleasures of a Country Scholar," ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch'' (Seoul: Korea Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, 1969): p. 86-7.</ref>
 故로 必須讀書窮理하여 求觀於古人하며

@@ 96번째 줄: / 96번째 줄: @@
 故로 必須讀書窮理하여 求觀於古人하며
-Therefore, it is necessary to read books, exhaustive deliberation over principle, to seek observation through the people of antiquity,
+Therefore, it is necessary to read books and exhaustively deliberate over principle, to seek observation through the people of antiquity,
 體驗於吾心하여 得其一善하여 勉行之면
-to verify manifestations [of them] in my mind; then having obtained the goodness of humans, if one diligently puts it into practice,
+and to verify manifestations [of principles/learning?] in my [one's?] mind; then having obtained the goodness of humans, if one diligently puts it into practice,
 則孝弟忠信之節이 自無不合於天叙之則矣라.

@@ 87번째 줄: / 87번째 줄: @@
 (YO) Good thinking. Linguistically speaking, 吾 and 我 seemed to have been differentiated grammatically, 吾 as possessive or as a subject (hence before a noun or a verb) but rarely as an object, and 我 as a possessive or as an object (hence before a noun or after a verb) but less commonly as a subject. Pulleyblank has once said that 我 is more emphatic and contrastive than 吾, and compared it to the disjunctive form ''moi'' in French versus ''me'' or ''je''. This distinction became less clear later but it does seem that both 吾 and 我 were used in one sentence when there is a need to distinguish them somehow--something similar to what you have noticed in this case.
-==='''Sentence 43 : (name)'''===
+==='''Sentence 43 : Ethan'''===
 ----
-<br />
+人非學問이면 固難知其何者가 爲孝며 何者가 爲忠이며 何者가 爲弟며 何者가 爲信
 *Discussion Questions: <br />

← 이전 판		2019년 7월 17일 (수) 14:26 판
68번째 줄:		68번째 줄:

	*Discussion Questions: <br />		*Discussion Questions: <br />
		+	(YO) Although 'calming' and 'tame' are the concepts I explained 和 and 順 in class, it might be taken a bit too stretching if we translate them like that. How about "The husband is kind and the wife, obedient (or acquiescent)"? <br />

	==='''Sentence 42 : Stella'''===		==='''Sentence 42 : Stella'''===

@@ 81번째 줄: / 81번째 줄: @@
 <br />
-----
 (Stella) I have translated the first-person pronouns 吾 and 我 as 'one' and 'oneself' to retain the imperative sense of the passage (~하라)

@@ 69번째 줄: / 69번째 줄: @@
 *Discussion Questions: <br />
-==='''Sentence 42 : (name)'''===
+==='''Sentence 42 : Stella'''===
 ----
-(abcd)
+凡人稟性이 初無不善이니<br />
 <br />
 *Discussion Questions: <br />
 ==='''Sentence 43 : (name)'''===

@@ 45번째 줄: / 45번째 줄: @@
 =='''Translation'''==
-==='''Sentence 41 : (name)'''===
+==='''Sentence 41 : Stella'''===
 ----
-(abcd)
+父慈而子孝하며<br />
 <br />
 *Discussion Questions: <br />
 ==='''Sentence 42 : (name)'''===