2018 推句 01 - 04 - 편집 역사

Youngoh64: /* Translation */

2018-07-15T21:56:50Z

‎Translation

2018-07-05T00:13:45Z

‎Poem 1 : Petra Sváková

2018-07-04T21:54:26Z

‎Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić

2018-07-04T21:53:27Z

‎Poem 1 : Petra Sváková

2018-07-04T21:52:54Z

‎Poem 1 : Petra Sváková

2018-07-04T21:40:25Z

‎Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić

2018-07-04T21:38:45Z

‎Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić

2018-07-04T21:33:41Z

‎Poem 1 : Petra Sváková

2018-07-03T13:41:02Z

poem 4

2018-07-03T10:29:30Z

‎Original Script

@@ 47번째 줄: / 47번째 줄: @@
-The sky is high and the sun, the moon, and the stars are bright,
+The sky is high and the sun and the moon are bright,
 the earth is thick and the plants and the trees are born [from it].
-The moon comes out and the sky opens its eye,
+The moon comes out, the sky opens its eye,
-the mountains are high and the earth raises its head.
+the mountains are high, the earth raises its head.

@@ 69번째 줄: / 69번째 줄: @@
 *Discussion Questions:
-. How can the representations of earthly (rivers and mountains) and heavenly (sun and moon) phenomena given in the first two lines be interpreted through the following angles:<br />
++ How can the representations of earthly (rivers and mountains) and heavenly (sun and moon) phenomena given in the first two lines be interpreted through the following angles:<br />
 a) the use of different words to denote long time periods, one seemingly longer than the other?<br />
 b) the use of two different verbs, one indicating a reflected image and one a painting or a backdrop?<br />
-. Based on the example given in the last line, please discuss the different options for translating culturally specific synecdoches and the pros and cons of each possible solution.<br />
 <br />
 <br />

@@ 57번째 줄: / 57번째 줄: @@
 *Discussion Questions:
-+(YO) There is no "stars" in the first line; In the second line, it could also be "...live [on it]," couldn't it?
++(YO) There is no "stars" in the first line; In the second line, it could also be "...live [on it]," couldn't it?<br />
 +(YO) For lines 3 and 4, would it be better if we make it something like: "The moon comes out; the sky opens its eye"? (Without the connecting "and".)

@@ 57번째 줄: / 57번째 줄: @@
 *Discussion Questions:
-#(YO) There is no "stars" in the first line; In the second line, it could also be "...live [on it]," couldn't it?
++(YO) There is no "stars" in the first line; In the second line, it could also be "...live [on it]," couldn't it?
-#(YO) For lines 3 and 4, would it be better if we make it something like: "The moon comes out; the sky opens its eye"? (Without the connecting "and".)
++(YO) For lines 3 and 4, would it be better if we make it something like: "The moon comes out; the sky opens its eye"? (Without the connecting "and".)
 ==='''Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić'''===

@@ 72번째 줄: / 72번째 줄: @@
 b) the use of two different verbs, one indicating a reflected image and one a painting or a backdrop?<br />
 . Based on the example given in the last line, please discuss the different options for translating culturally specific synecdoches and the pros and cons of each possible solution.
 [[Category:2018 Hanmun Summer Workshop]]
 [[Category:Intermediate Training Group]]

← 이전 판		2018년 7월 4일 (수) 21:33 판
57번째 줄:		57번째 줄:

	*Discussion Questions:		*Discussion Questions:
		+	#(YO) There is no "stars" in the first line; In the second line, it could also be "...live [on it]," couldn't it?
		+	#(YO) For lines 3 and 4, would it be better if we make it something like: "The moon comes out; the sky opens its eye"? (Without the connecting "and".)

	==='''Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić'''===		==='''Poem 4 : Jelena Gledić'''===

@@ 9번째 줄: / 9번째 줄: @@
 天高日月明이요
-地厚草木生이라
+地厚草木生이라.
 月出天開眼이요
@@ 26번째 줄: / 26번째 줄: @@
 南北鴻雁路라.
 }}
 =='''Translation'''==