(Translation) 1480年金孝之妻黃氏分給文記 - 편집 역사

2022년 2월 14일 (월) 17:21에 Lotus님의 편집

2022-02-14T17:21:20Z

Admin: /* Visualization */

2019-07-24T14:58:42Z

‎Visualization

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:58에 2bthebridge님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:58:13Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:56에 2bthebridge님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:56:17Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:22에 2bthebridge님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:22:56Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:17에 Kingkwow님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:17:58Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:15에 Kingkwow님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:15:21Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:13에 Jangseogak님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:13:59Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:13에 Kingkwow님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:13:27Z

2018년 7월 20일 (금) 01:09에 Hu777jing님의 편집

2018-07-20T01:09:42Z

@@ 167번째 줄: / 167번째 줄: @@
 # Why this document does not mention 奉祀位(a share especially designated for the purpose of giving sacrificial rites) or anything related to ancestral rites? (Compare this one to the next document written by Lady Kim (安繼宗 妻 金氏) in 1535<ref>http://dh.aks.ac.kr/jsg/index.php/(Translation)_1535%E5%B9%B4_%E5%AE%89%E7%B9%BC%E5%AE%97_%E5%A6%BB_%E9%87%91%E6%B0%8F_%E8%A1%BF%E7%B5%A6%E6%96%87%E8%A8%98</ref> which heavily emphasized 奉祀位) In this sense, this document might prove the Confucian transfer in the 16th century. - confer the other legal document<ref>http://archive.aks.ac.kr/inspection/insDirView.aspx?dataUCI=G002+AKS+KSM-XD.1483.1111-20101008.B001a_001_00088_XXX</ref> confirming the adoption of Hyoro. This shows that the adopted son Hyoro conducted sacrificial rites for three years which means that the custom of ancestral rites already existed, but setting aside certain amount of land only for the purpose of sacrificial rites appears later.
 # Lady Hwang ordered another document for transmitting her real estate ten days later in the same year<ref>http://archive.aks.ac.kr/inspection/insDirView.aspx?dataUCI=G002+AKS+KSM-XE.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_001</ref>. Why would she make this distinction between the slaves and the lands and house?
 <div style="color:#008080;">
 * View together with '''~~'''.
 </div>
--->
 * 김학수 외, 예안 광산김씨 오천 고문서 역주, 한국학중앙연구원 출판부, 2017.
+*
@@ 299번째 줄: / 299번째 줄: @@
 [[Category:2018 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop]]
 [[Category:Advanced Translation Group]]

@@ 297번째 줄: / 297번째 줄: @@
 [[분류:Network Graph Script]]
-[[Category:2018 Hanmun Summer Workshop]]
+[[Category:2018 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop]]
 [[Category:Advanced Translation Group]]

@@ 174번째 줄: / 174번째 줄: @@
 </div>
 -->
+* 김학수 외, 예안 광산김씨 오천 고문서 역주, 한국학중앙연구원 출판부, 2017.
+*

@@ 165번째 줄: / 165번째 줄: @@
 # According to this document, secondary sons received part of the property. What does this document tell us about the difference in status between primary children and secondary sons?
 # Could a person actually be allowed to give his/her properties to someone absolutely not legitimate by writing such a document? Did the authorities have the power to cancel the clauses of this document? In the case they would, what would be the reasons for them to do so?
-# Why this document does not mention 봉사위 or anything related to ancestral rites? (Compare this one to the next document written by 김씨 in 1535 which heavily emphasized 봉사위) In this sense, this document might prove the Confucian transfer in the 16th century.
+# Why this document does not mention 奉祀位(a share especially designated for the purpose of giving sacrificial rites) or anything related to ancestral rites? (Compare this one to the next document written by Lady Kim (安繼宗 妻 金氏) in 1535<ref>http://dh.aks.ac.kr/jsg/index.php/(Translation)_1535%E5%B9%B4_%E5%AE%89%E7%B9%BC%E5%AE%97_%E5%A6%BB_%E9%87%91%E6%B0%8F_%E8%A1%BF%E7%B5%A6%E6%96%87%E8%A8%98</ref> which heavily emphasized 奉祀位) In this sense, this document might prove the Confucian transfer in the 16th century. - confer the other legal document<ref>http://archive.aks.ac.kr/inspection/insDirView.aspx?dataUCI=G002+AKS+KSM-XD.1483.1111-20101008.B001a_001_00088_XXX</ref> confirming the adoption of Hyoro. This shows that the adopted son Hyoro conducted sacrificial rites for three years which means that the custom of ancestral rites already existed, but setting aside certain amount of land only for the purpose of sacrificial rites appears later.
 # Lady Hwang ordered another document for transmitting her real estate ten days later in the same year<ref>http://archive.aks.ac.kr/inspection/insDirView.aspx?dataUCI=G002+AKS+KSM-XE.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_001</ref>. Why would she make this distinction between the slaves and the lands and house?

@@ 166번째 줄: / 166번째 줄: @@
 # Could a person actually be allowed to give his/her properties to someone absolutely not legitimate by writing such a document? Did the authorities have the power to cancel the clauses of this document? In the case they would, what would be the reasons for them to do so?
 # Why this document does not mention 봉사위 or anything related to ancestral rites? (Compare this one to the next document written by 김씨 in 1535 which heavily emphasized 봉사위) In this sense, this document might prove the Confucian transfer in the 16th century.
-# Lady Hwang ordered another document for transmitting her real estate ten days later in the same year<ref>GOEUN</ref>. Why would she make this distinction between the slaves and the lands and house?
+# Lady Hwang ordered another document for transmitting her real estate ten days later in the same year<ref>http://archive.aks.ac.kr/inspection/insDirView.aspx?dataUCI=G002+AKS+KSM-XE.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_001</ref>. Why would she make this distinction between the slaves and the lands and house?
 =='''Further Readings'''==

@@ 1번째 줄: / 1번째 줄: @@
 {{Primary Source Document3
 |Image = 1480김효지처황씨분급문기1.JPG
-|English = the 1480 Record of Property Distribution of Gim Hyoji's Wife Lady Hwang
+|English = Year 1480 Record of Property Distribution of Gim Hyoji's Wife Lady Hwang
 |Chinese = 1480年 金孝之 妻 黃氏 分給文記
 |Korean = [http://archive.aks.ac.kr/imageViewer/ImageViewer.aspx?datauci=G002+AKS+KSM-XE.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_001&refuci=G002+AKS+KSM-XD.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_002&fname=G002+AKS+KSM-XE.1480.4717-20101008.B001a_001_00310_001-IMG.001.jpg&closed=true 1480년 김효지 처 황씨 분급문기(''Gim Hyoji cheo Hwang Ssi bun-geub-mun-gi'')]

@@ 252번째 줄: / 252번째 줄: @@
 *Discussion Questions:
-Can a person actually be allowed to give his/her properties to someone absolutely not legitimate by writing such a document? Are the authorities in power to cancel the clauses of this document? In the case they would, what would be the minimum requirements for them to do so?
+Could a person actually be allowed to give his/her properties to someone absolutely not legitimate by writing such a document? Did the authorities have the power to cancel the clauses of this document? In the case they would, what would be the reasons for them to do so?
 ==='''Student 9 : (Write your name)'''===

@@ 10번째 줄: / 10번째 줄: @@
 |Key Concepts= Neo-Confucianism, Adoption, Property, Inheritance, Lineage, Social and Economic History, Filial Piety, Women's Status
 |Translator = [[2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)#Participants | Participants of 2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group)]]
-|Editor =
+|Editor = King Kwong Wong, Younès M'Ghari, Lee Goeun
 |Translation Year = 2018
 }}

@@ 294번째 줄: / 294번째 줄: @@
 =='''Visualization'''==
-{{NetworkGraph | title=Celery4.lst}}
+{{NetworkGraph | title=Hujing.lst}}
 [[분류:Network Graph Script]]
 [[Category:2018 Hanmun Summer Workshop]]
 [[Category:Advanced Translation Group]]

(Translation) 1480年 金孝之 妻 黃氏 分給文記 - 편집 역사