(Translation) 徐命膺北學議序 - 편집 역사

2022년 2월 14일 (월) 16:47에 Lotus님의 편집

2022-02-14T16:47:49Z

Samscnp: /* Introduction */

2020-06-16T08:53:33Z

‎Introduction

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:46에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-16T08:46:30Z

Samscnp: /* Introduction */

2020-06-16T08:42:29Z

‎Introduction

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:41에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-16T08:41:28Z

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:22에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-16T08:22:40Z

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:21에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-16T08:21:59Z

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:20에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-16T08:20:58Z

2020년 6월 15일 (월) 11:49에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-15T11:49:19Z

2020년 6월 9일 (화) 15:49에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020-06-09T15:49:49Z

@@ 69번째 줄: / 69번째 줄: @@
 |-
 |}
+<!--
 =='''Discussion Questions'''==
+#
@@ 76번째 줄: / 76번째 줄: @@
 =='''Further Readings'''==
-<!--
 <div style="color:#008080;">
 * View together with '''~~'''.
 </div>
--->
+*
+*
@@ 214번째 줄: / 214번째 줄: @@
 [[Category:2019 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop]]
 [[Category:Advanced Translation Group]]

← 이전 판		2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:53 판
31번째 줄:		31번째 줄:

	Reference:		Reference:
		+
		+	Chung, Ah-young. "A harbinger of Korean literary modernism." The Korean Times. Feb 18, 2011.
		+
		+	"보만재집 保晩齋集 [Literary Miscellany of Pomanjae]" Han'gung Minjong Munhwa Daebaek kwa Sajŏn 한국민족문화대백과사전 [Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/Item/E0023327 (accessed 16 June 2020)
		+
		+	"북학 北學 [Puk'ak]" Han'gung Minjong Munhwa Daebaek kwa Sajŏn 한국민족문화대백과사전 [Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/SearchNavi?keyword=%E5%8C%97%E5%AD%B8&ridx=0&tot=3765 (accessed 16 June 2020)
		+
		+	"북학의 北學議 [Discourse on Puk'ak]" Han'gung Minjong Munhwa Daebaek kwa Sajŏn 한국민족문화대백과사전 [Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/SearchNavi?keyword=%E5%8C%97%E5%AD%B8&ridx=1&tot=3765 (accessed 16 June 2020)
		+
		+	"서명응 徐命膺 [Sŏ Myŏngŭng]" Han'gung Minjong Munhwa Daebaek kwa Sajŏn 한국민족문화대백과사전 [Encyclopedia of Korean Culture]. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/SearchNavi?keyword=%EC%84%9C%EB%AA%85%EC%9D%91&ridx=0&tot=11 (accessed 16 June 2020)

	=='''Original Script'''==		=='''Original Script'''==

@@ 7번째 줄: / 7번째 줄: @@
 |Type =
 |Author = Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺
-|Year =
+|Year = 1822
 |Source = [http://db.itkc.or.kr/inLink?DCI=ITKC_MO_0540A_0080_010_0260_2005_A233_XML Korean Classics and Literati's Collection of Writings (한국고전종합DB)]
 |Key Concepts=

@@ 26번째 줄: / 26번째 줄: @@
 “Introduction to Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議序” is an introductory piece written by Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺  for Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議, a foundational text of an emerging school of thought in 17th century Choson called the School of Puk'ak (literally translated to Northern Learning). The introduction explains the background as well as some of the motivations that prompted many thinkers of Sŏ’s time to embrace the new philosophy of Puk'ak.  For readers who are unfamiliar with relevant history, this introduction serves as an excellent introduction to the rise of Puk'ak, an important episode in Choson intellectual history with which any serious Choson history students ought to familiarize themselves.
-The School of Puk'ak gained currency in the Choson intellectual sphere around the early 18th century, introducing a country-wide debate and re-examination of how Choson ought to strengthen itself. Treating the relatively more technologically advanced Qing dynasty as a model of economic and social reform, proponents of Northern Learning asserted that mastery over material processes, especially those related to agriculture, means of production and commerce, was the panacea for the ills of Choson. In particular, together with Hong Taeyong 洪大容 and Pak Chiwŏn 朴趾源, Pak Cheka 朴齊家, the author of Discourse on Puk'ak, espoused the belief that technological advancement and mastery over the material world would translate to prosperity and wealth of a country. The School of Puk'ak was also referred to as the School of Sirhak, or Practical Learning 實學, and the School of Profitable Usage and Benefiting the People利用厚生派. Historiographically speaking, the advent of Puk'ak is monumental for two main reasons. First, it represents a heuristic departure for the Choson intellectuals from Neo-Confucianism, the philosophy that had dominated the country’s intellectual landscape for centuries and a school of thought that largely, and for some overtly, concerned itself with the metaphysics rather than the practical. Second, it also signals a change of attitude in Choson towards the Qing, which the Chosons, because of the Qing’s non-Sinic background, had held to be “culturally inferior” than themselves and refused to view as cultural equals. In this light, what the proponents of Puk'ak were advocating was quite revolutionary. Some would even suggest that the likes of Pak Chiwŏn to be the “harbinger” of Korean modernism (1).
+The School of Puk'ak gained currency in the Choson intellectual sphere around the early 18th century, introducing a country-wide debate and re-examination of how Choson ought to strengthen itself. Treating the relatively more technologically advanced Qing dynasty as a model of economic and social reform, proponents of Northern Learning asserted that mastery over material processes, especially those related to agriculture, means of production and commerce, was the panacea for the ills of Choson. In particular, together with Hong Taeyong 洪大容 and Pak Chiwŏn 朴趾源, Pak Cheka 朴齊家, the author of Discourse on Puk'ak, espoused the belief that technological advancement and mastery over the material world would translate to prosperity and wealth of a country. The School of Puk'ak was also referred to as the School of Sirhak, or Practical Learning 實學, and the School of Profitable Usage and Benefiting the People利用厚生派. Historiographically speaking, the advent of Puk'ak is monumental for two main reasons. First, it represents a heuristic departure for the Choson intellectuals from Neo-Confucianism, the philosophy that had dominated the country’s intellectual landscape for centuries and a school of thought that largely, and for some overtly, concerned itself with the metaphysics rather than the practical. Second, it also signals a change of attitude in Choson towards the Qing, which the Chosons, because of the Qing’s non-Sinic background, had held to be “culturally inferior” than themselves and refused to view as cultural equals. In this light, what the proponents of Puk'ak were advocating was quite revolutionary. Some would even suggest that the likes of Pak Chiwŏn to be the “harbinger” of Korean modernism.
 =='''Original Script'''==

@@ 24번째 줄: / 24번째 줄: @@
 =='''Introduction'''==
-“Preface to Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議序” is an introductory piece written by Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺  for Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議, a foundational text of an emerging school of thought in 17th century Choson called the School of Puk'ak (literally translated to Northern Learning). The preface explains the background as well as some of the motivations that prompted many thinkers of Sŏ’s time to embrace the new philosophy of Puk'ak.  For readers who are unfamiliar with relevant history, this preface serves as an excellent introduction to the rise of Puk'ak, an important episode in Choson intellectual history with which any serious Choson history students ought to familiarize themselves.
+“Introduction to Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議序” is an introductory piece written by Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺  for Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議, a foundational text of an emerging school of thought in 17th century Choson called the School of Puk'ak (literally translated to Northern Learning). The introduction explains the background as well as some of the motivations that prompted many thinkers of Sŏ’s time to embrace the new philosophy of Puk'ak.  For readers who are unfamiliar with relevant history, this introduction serves as an excellent introduction to the rise of Puk'ak, an important episode in Choson intellectual history with which any serious Choson history students ought to familiarize themselves.
 The School of Puk'ak gained currency in the Choson intellectual sphere around the early 18th century, introducing a country-wide debate and re-examination of how Choson ought to strengthen itself. Treating the relatively more technologically advanced Qing dynasty as a model of economic and social reform, proponents of Northern Learning asserted that mastery over material processes, especially those related to agriculture, means of production and commerce, was the panacea for the ills of Choson. In particular, together with Hong Taeyong 洪大容 and Pak Chiwŏn 朴趾源, Pak Cheka 朴齊家, the author of Discourse on Puk'ak, espoused the belief that technological advancement and mastery over the material world would translate to prosperity and wealth of a country. The School of Puk'ak was also referred to as the School of Sirhak, or Practical Learning 實學, and the School of Profitable Usage and Benefiting the People利用厚生派. Historiographically speaking, the advent of Puk'ak is monumental for two main reasons. First, it represents a heuristic departure for the Choson intellectuals from Neo-Confucianism, the philosophy that had dominated the country’s intellectual landscape for centuries and a school of thought that largely, and for some overtly, concerned itself with the metaphysics rather than the practical. Second, it also signals a change of attitude in Choson towards the Qing, which the Chosons, because of the Qing’s non-Sinic background, had held to be “culturally inferior” than themselves and refused to view as cultural equals. In this light, what the proponents of Puk'ak were advocating was quite revolutionary. Some would even suggest that the likes of Pak Chiwŏn to be the “harbinger” of Korean modernism (1).
-It is against this backdrop that Pak Chiwŏn embarked on writing Discourse on Puk'ak, the preface of which was entrusted to Sŏ Myŏngŭng, a like-minded peer of Pak and a high official in the Choson court. In the preface, Sŏ particularly stressed the importance of mastering the numerical standards of the material world. Sŏ was also recognized by contemporaries as well as later generations to be one of the founders of the School of Northern Learning.
+It is against this backdrop that Pak Chiwŏn embarked on writing Discourse on Puk'ak, for which Sŏ Myŏngŭng, a like-minded peer of Pak and a high official in the Choson court, wrote an introductory text. In the introduction, Sŏ particularly stressed the importance of mastering the numerical standards of the material world. Sŏ was also recognized by contemporaries as well as later generations to be one of the founders of the School of Northern Learning. The introduction was later compiled into a compilation of Sŏ’s personal writings named the “Literary Miscellany of Pomanjae 保晩齋集 (Pomanjae was Sŏ’s cognomen),” in which “Introduction to Discourse on Puk'ak 北學議序” was featured and preserved for us.

@@ 6번째 줄: / 6번째 줄: @@
 |Genre = [[Literati Writings]]
 |Type =
-|Author = 徐命膺
+|Author = Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺
 |Year =
 |Source = [http://db.itkc.or.kr/inLink?DCI=ITKC_MO_0540A_0080_010_0260_2005_A233_XML Korean Classics and Literati's Collection of Writings (한국고전종합DB)]

@@ 10번째 줄: / 10번째 줄: @@
 |Source = [http://db.itkc.or.kr/inLink?DCI=ITKC_MO_0540A_0080_010_0260_2005_A233_XML Korean Classics and Literati's Collection of Writings (한국고전종합DB)]
 |Key Concepts=
-|Translator = [[2019 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)#Participants | Participants of 2019 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group)]]
+|Translator =  	Samuel Chan Sai Hay 陳世熙 진세희
-|Editor =
+|Editor =  	Samuel Chan Sai Hay 陳世熙 진세희
 |Translation Year = 2019

← 이전 판		2020년 6월 15일 (월) 11:49 판
23번째 줄:		23번째 줄:

	=='''Introduction'''==		=='''Introduction'''==
		+
		+	“Preface to The Commentary on Puk'ak 北學議序” is an introductory piece written by Sŏ Myŏngŭng 徐命膺 for The Commentary on Puk'ak 北學議, a foundational text of an emerging school of thought in 17th century Choson called the School of Puk'ak (literally translated to Northern Learning). The preface sheds light on the background as well as some of the motivations that prompted many thinkers of Sŏ’s time to embrace the new philosophy of Puk'ak. For readers who are unfamiliar with relevant history, this preface serves as an excellent introduction to the rise of Puk'ak, an important episode in Choson intellectual history with which any serious Choson history students ought to familiarize themselves.
		+
		+	The School of Puk'ak came into vogue in the Choson intellectual sphere around the early 17th century, bringing about a country-wide debate and re-examination of how Choson ought to strengthen itself through material means. Learning from the case of the neighboring and relatively technologically advanced Qing dynasty, proponents of Northern Learning asserted that the mastery over material processes, especially those related to agriculture, means of production and commerce, was the panacea for the ills of Choson. In particular, together with Hong Taeyong 洪大容 and Pak Chiwŏn 朴趾源, Pak Cheka 朴齊家, the author of the aforementioned The Commentary on Puk'ak, espoused the belief that material advancement would translate to prosperity and wealth of a country. The School of Puk'ak was also referred to under many other different names, such as the School of Sirhak or Practical Learning 實學 and the School of Profitable Usage and Benefiting the People利用厚生派. Historiographically speaking, the advent of Puk'ak is monumental for two main reasons. First, it represents a heuristic attempt for Choson intellectuals to experiment with a departure from Neo-Confucianism, the philosophy that had dominated the country’s intellectual landscape for centuries and a school of thought that largely, and for some overtly, concerned itself with the metaphysics rather than the practical. Second, it also signals a change of attitude in Choson towards the Qing people, whom the Chosons, because of the Qing’s non-Sinic background, had held to be “culturally inferior” than themselves and refused to view as cultural equals. In this light, what the proponents of Puk'ak were advocating was actually quite revolutionary. Some would even suggest that the likes of Pak Chiwŏn to be the “harbinger” of Korean modernism.
		+
		+	It is against this backdrop that Pak Chiwŏn embarked on writing The Commentary on Puk'ak, the preface of which was entrusted to Sŏ Myŏngŭng, a like-minded peer of Pak and a high official in the Choson court. In the preface, Sŏ particularly stressed the importance of mastering the numerical standards of the material world. Sŏ was also recognized by contemporaries as well as later generations to be one of the founders of the School of Northern Learning.

@@ 1번째 줄: / 1번째 줄: @@
 {{Primary Source Document3
 |Image = 서명응 북학의서1.jpg
-|English = Preface to Commentary on Puk'ak
+|English = Preface to The Commentary on Puk'ak
 |Chinese = 北學議 序
 |Korean = 북학의 서(''Bukagui Seo'')

(Translation) 徐命膺 北學議序 - 편집 역사

2022년 2월 14일 (월) 16:47에 Lotus님의 편집

Samscnp: /* Introduction */

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:46에 Samscnp님의 편집

Samscnp: /* Introduction */

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:41에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:22에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:21에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020년 6월 16일 (화) 08:20에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020년 6월 15일 (월) 11:49에 Samscnp님의 편집

2020년 6월 9일 (화) 15:49에 Samscnp님의 편집

(Translation) 徐命膺北學議序 - 편집 역사