(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

2018-07-19T07:36:46Z

Inho Choi:

{{Primary Source Document3.1
|Image = ITKC MO 0201A A044 292L.jpg
|English = The True Record of Kija
|Chinese = 箕子實記
|Korean = [http://db.itkc.or.kr/inLink?DCI=ITKC_MO_0201A_A044_292L_IMG 기자실기(''Kijashilgi'') ]
|Genre =
|Type =
|Author = 李珥
|Year = 1580
|Key Concepts= China-Korea relations, Neo-Confucianism
|Translator = [[2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)#Participants | Participants of 2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group)]]
|Editor = Inho Choi
|Translation Year = 2018

}}

=='''Introduction'''==
The True Record of Kija was written by the famous Korean Neo-Confucian scholar I I(李珥). The story of Kija is recurrent topic in the Korean writings, and there has been a religious worship of Kija since the three dynasty period. Although it has never been a major literary theme, it has a unique importance since it forms a long-standing coherent literary unit that is reflective of the changing Korean relationship with the political entities in China. By tracing its transmission and changes, it is possible to grasp the historical transformations of the changing Sino-Korean relationship. It was Shiji that first records Kija's eastward coming to Chosŏn. It tells King Wu of Zhou enfeoffed him to Chosŏn. In Korean writings, this story first appears in the early Koryŏ period.

Based on the research by Han Yŏngu,<ref>한영우. 1982. 고려-조선전기의 기자인식. 한국문화. 제 3권. </ref> we can reconstruct three phases of Kija story. In the first phase the ends around the Shilla-Koryŏ transition. In this period, Kija was deemed as one of the ancestral gods of the Korean country rather than a vassal enfeoffed by a Chinese emperor. The story of Kija transformed significantly in the process of the newly found Koryŏ's negotiation with China. The Chinese states wanted to emphasize the story that Kija was a Chinese vassal and that his role was mainly to transmit the advanced Chinese culture to Korea. Koryŏ court partially accepted this view and treated Kija as the teacher of ritual and moral edification. Third phase is concurrent with the influx of Neo-Confucian thoughts. Starting with the Songs of Emperors and Kings(帝王韻紀) by I Sŭnghyu, it was emphasized that Kija told the Great Plan with Nine Principles(洪範九疇) to King Wu. This new element of universal principles open up a interpretive space.

I I's version of story is situated in this last phase, and yet he adds his own unique features by making use of the interpretive space opened up by the new Neo-Confucian discourse. We can discern at least three important changes that I I makes. First, I I makes it clear that to become a ruler either in China and Korea one should be a sage or be thought by a sage. Kija's role now becomes a teacher of Neo-Confucian sagely teaching. He is the one who embodies the way of Sage(身傳聖道), and he is the King-Teacher(君師)of Korea, the ideal model of the Neo-Confucian kingship. King Wu himself was somewhat lost(he had to ask Kija whether his rebellion was justifiable), and becomes whole only after he was given the teaching of the Great Plan with Nine principle. He even had to empty his self(虛己) before asking Kija.

Second the role of Choson as a equal partner in ordering the world through the Way is established in his version. Kija becomes a pivot in this partnership. He says, "Majestic! You Kija. Having already laid out the Great Plan to King Wu so that the Way became bright in China, you inferred those that still remains unfulfilled and made the transforming government to be abundant in the Three Hans(三韓).<ref>大哉箕子。旣陳洪範於武王。道明于華夏。推其緖餘。化洽于三韓。</ref>

Third, through figuring an emotional account of King Wu's relationship with Kija, he creates a communicative depth between the Chinese King and the Korean sage. This feature is very unique to I I's version and did not appear in the previous version.

=='''Original Script'''==

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%; background-color:#ffffff;"
!style="width:25%;"|Image || style="width:30%;"|Text || style="width:45%;"|translation
|-
| [[File:기자실기 1.JPG|400px]]
||
箕子實記

箕子。商宗室也。或曰名胥餘。學明九疇。身傳聖道。以畿內諸侯。仕爲太師。帝乙謫子受。資辨捷疾。拒諫飾非。其庶兄啓。恪愼克孝。箕子度受非元良。以啓長且賢。勸帝乙立之。帝乙難於廢嫡。卒立受爲太子。封啓爲微子。帝乙崩。受卽位號爲紂。始爲象箸。箕子歎曰。彼爲象箸。必爲玉杯。爲玉杯。則必思遠方珍怪之物而御之矣。輿馬宮室之漸。自此始。不可振也。紂淫虐日甚。微子痛殷將亡。謀於箕子及少師比干曰。今殷其淪喪。若涉大水。其無津涯。今爾無指告予顚隮。若之何其。箕子曰。商今其有災。我興受其敗。商其淪喪。我罔爲臣僕。詔王子出迪。我舊云刻子。王子弗出。我乃顚隮。自靖。人自獻于先王。我不顧行遯。微子乃去之。箕子諫紂。紂不聽。囚箕子以爲奴。人或曰。可以去矣。箕子曰。爲人臣。諫不聽而去。是彰君之惡。而自說於民。

||
translation
|-
| [[File:기자실기2.JPG|400px]]
||
吾不忍爲也。乃被髮伴狂而受辱。鼓琴以自悲。故傳之曰箕子操。比干諫而不退。紂殺之。周武王克商。命召公奭。釋箕子之囚。王就見之。虛己問殷所以亡曰。吾殺紂。是歟非歟。箕子不忍言。王乃問以天道曰。嗚呼。箕子。惟天。陰騭下民。相協厥居。我不知其彝倫攸敍。箕子乃言曰。我聞。在昔鯀。陻洪水。汩陳其五行。帝乃震怒。不畀洪範九疇。彝倫攸斁。鯀則殛死。禹乃嗣興。天乃錫禹洪範九疇。彝倫攸敍。乃陳洪範。其大目。一曰五行。二曰敬用五事。三曰農用八政。四曰協用五紀。五曰建用皇極。六曰乂用三德。七曰明用稽疑。八曰念用庶徵。九曰嚮用五福。威用六極。其論皇極曰。無偏無陂。遵王之義。無有作好。遵王之道。無有作惡。遵王之路。無偏無黨。王道蕩蕩。無黨無偏。王道平平。無反無側。王道正直。會其有極。歸其有極。箕子旣爲武王傳道。不肯仕。武王亦不敢强。箕子乃避中國。東入朝鮮。中國人隨之者五千。詩書禮樂醫巫陰陽卜筮之流。百工技藝皆從焉。武王聞之。因封以朝鮮。都平壤。初至言語不通。譯而知之。敎其民以禮義農蠶織作。經畫井田之制。設禁八條。其略。相殺償以命。相傷以穀償。相盜者男沒爲其家奴。女爲婢。欲自贖者。人五十萬。雖免爲民。俗猶羞之。嫁娶無所售。是以。其民不盜。無門戶之閉。婦人貞信不浮辟。

||
... King Wu of the Zhou conquered the Shang, and order Shaogongshi(召公奭) to release Kija. The King proceeded to see him. He empties his self and inquired about that because of which the Yin had been ruined. He said, "My killing of Zhou, was it right or wrong?" Kija could not bear to say. The King then inquired about the Way of Heaven. He said, ''"Oh! count of Qi, Heaven, (working) unseen, secures the tranquillity of the lower people, aiding them to be in harmony with their condition. I do not know how the unvarying principles (of its method in doing so) should be set forth in due order." The count of Qi thereupon replied, "I have heard that in old time Gun dammed up the inundating waters, and thereby threw into disorder the arrangement of the five elements. God was consequently roused to anger, and did not give him the Great Plan with its nine divisions, and thus the unvarying principles (of Heaven's method) were allowed to go to ruin. Gun was therefore kept a prisoner till his death, and his son Yu rose up (and entered on the same undertaking). To him Heaven gave the Great Plan with its nine divisions, and the unvarying principles (of its method) were set forth in their due order."''<ref> The italicized text is the translation of the Great Plan of the Book of Zhou(周書洪範)by James Legge. This part is a verbatim citation of this part of the Book of Zhou. https://ctext.org/shang-shu/great-plan?searchu=%E7%AE%95%E5%AD%90&searchmode=showall#result </ref>
Then, he explained the Great Plan(洪範). The main items are the following. The first is called Five Phases(五行). The second is to use five matters for reverence. The third is to use eight policies for agriculture. The forth is to use five cosmological cycles for cooperation. The fifth is to use the standard of the imperial greatness. The sixth is to use three virtues for governing. The seventh is to use reflection for clarity. The eighth is to use timely order for thought. The ninth is to use five fortunes for pleasure and to use six misfortunes for awe.

As for the discussion on the imperial greatness(皇極), it says There shall be no being decentered and no being uneven and respect the righteousness of King. There shall be no personal liking and follow the way of King. There shall be no personal disliking and follow the path of King. There shall be no being decentered and no taking side, and the way of King will be broad and expansive. There shall be no taking side and no being decentered, and the way of King will be even and fair. There shall be no violation of principle and no incorrection, and the way of the king will be straight. When gathering subjects, there must be a standard. When returning to the lord, there must be a standard. Kija had already transmitted the Way for the sake of King Wu and did not want to serve in his court. King Wu, too, did not dare to force him. Kija, then, avoided the central country and came eastward to Chosŏn. Those Chinese who followed him were five thousand. They were the kinds who deal with Songs, Books, Rituals, Music, Medicine, Worship, Yin and Yang, and Prognostication. The artisans and artists of numerous kinds all followed him. King Wu heard of this, and enfeoffed him with Chosŏn. He set up his capital at P'yŏngyang. When he first arrived, languages did not fit. He understood the native language through translation. He edified that people with rituals and righteousness and with agriculture, sericulture, weaving, and craft and instituted the well-filed demarcation.

He laid out the articles of eight prohibitions。Those who kill people shall recompense with their life. Those who hurt others shall recompense with their crops. Those who steal from a house shall be deprived and become male slaves of that house. Women shall become female slaves. [Among the thieves,] those who want surrender themselves to the justice have to pay five hundred thousand [unit missing]. Although they avoid being enslaved and remain as commoners, the custom deemed it to be shameful. The marriage arrangement had no those that by which one can be sold and bought. Hence, that people had no stealing and no closing of house doors. The wives were straight and faithful, and were not careless and partial.

|-
| [[File:기자실기3.JPG|400px]]
||
其田野都邑。飮食以籩豆。崇信讓篤儒術。釀成中國之風敎。以勿尙兵鬪。以德服强暴。鄰國皆慕其義歸附。衣冠制度。悉同乎中國。其後。箕子朝周。過故殷墟。見宮室毀壞。生朱黍。箕子傷之。作麥秀之歌曰。麥秀漸漸兮。禾黍油油。彼狡童兮。不與我好兮。殷民聞之。皆流涕。朝鮮被仁賢之化。爲詩書禮樂之邦。朝野無事。人民懽悅。以大同江比黃河。作歌以頌其德。箕子薨。箕氏世君東土。周末。燕伯稱王。將東略地。朝鮮侯欲興兵伐燕以尊周。大夫禮諫之而止。使禮西說燕。燕亦止不侵。侯亦自稱王。後子孫稍驕虐。燕乃遣將攻其西。取地二千餘里。至滿潘汗爲界。朝鮮遂弱。及秦幷天下。築長地抵遼東。朝鮮王否畏秦服。屬。否薨。子準立十餘年。而秦滅燕，齊，趙。民多亡入朝鮮。及盧綰王燕。朝鮮與燕以浿水爲界。及綰入凶奴。燕人衛滿亡命。聚黨千餘人。東渡浿水。求居西界爲藩屏。王準信之。拜爲博士。賜以圭。封之百里。令守西鄙。滿誘納逋逃。衆漸盛。乃遣人詐告王準。漢兵十道至。欲入宿衛。遂襲王準。戰不敵。浮海南奔。朝鮮遂爲滿有。自箕子傳四十一代凡九百二十八年而失國。箕準被逐。率其左右宮人。入居韓地金馬郡。號馬韓王。統小國五十餘。亦傳累世。厥後新羅，高句麗，百濟三國漸大。馬韓寖衰。百濟始祖溫祚王二十六年。襲馬韓幷其國。

||
(translation)
|-
| [[File:기자실기4.JPG|400px]]
||
箕氏主馬韓又二百年而亡。傳祚前後凡一千一百二十餘年。
贊曰。猗歟大師。運遭明夷。內貞而晦。制義隨時。被髮操音。惟天我知。宗國旣淪。嗚呼曷歸。法授蒼姬。身莅靑㙨。誕闢土宇。樂浪作京。鰈域長夜。肇照日星。禁設八條。文宣禮樂。江淸大同。山重太白。子孫繩繩。千祀是卜。五世不斬。迄受遺澤。報祀仁辟。極天如昨。
謹按。天生蒸民。必降聖賢以主之。輔相化育。宣朗人文。以遂其生。以立其敎。伏羲以下。迄于三王。代天開物。故命之以我東有民。想不後中國。未聞睿智有作。以盡君師之責。檀君首出。文獻罔稽。恭惟箕子。誕莅朝鮮。不鄙夷其民。養之厚而敎之勤。變魋結之俗。成齊魯之邦。民到于今。受其賜。禮變之習。濟濟不替。至於夫子。有浮海欲居之志。則微禹之嘆。沒世愈深矣。大哉箕子。旣陳洪範於武王。道明于華夏。推其緖餘。化洽于三韓。子孫傳祚千有餘年。後辟景仰。若揭日月。崇德報功。世篤其典。苟非元聖。烏能致此。嗚呼盛矣哉。齊人只知有管，晏。此固不免坐井。至於洙泗之儒。深繹夫子微言。洛閩之士。偏傳程朱遺敎。亦其理宜也。我東受箕子罔極之恩。其於實迹。宜家誦而人熟也。然今之土。被人猝問。鮮能條答。蓋由羣書散漫。學之不博也。
||
(translation)
|-
| [[File:기자실기5.JPG|400px]]
||
尹公斗壽曾奉使朝天。中朝士人。多問箕子之爲。尹公病不能專對。旣還。乃廣考經史子書。裒集事實及聖賢之論。下至騷人之詠。摭而成書。名曰。箕子志。其功良勤。而其嘉惠後學。亦云至矣。第念雜編徑傳。統紀難尋。珥乃不揆僭濫。竊採志中所錄。約成一篇。因略敍立國始終。世系歷年之數。名曰箕子實紀。庶便觀覽焉。萬曆八年庚辰仲夏。後學德水李珥。謹志。
||
(translation)
|-
|}

*Discussion Questions:

=='''References'''==

=='''Footnotes'''==

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

2018-07-19T05:21:29Z

Inho Choi:

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

2018-07-19T05:12:05Z

Inho Choi:

2018-07-19T01:19:29Z

Inho Choi:

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

2018-07-18T16:21:51Z

Inho Choi:

2018-07-18T14:43:18Z

Inho Choi:

李珥箕子實記

2018-07-18T02:38:12Z

Inho Choi:

{{Primary Source Document3
|Image = 성언.JPG
|English =
|Chinese = 靑城雜記醒言
|Korean = 청성잡기 성언(''Cheongseongjapgi Seongeon'')
|Genre = [[Literati Writings]]
|Type =
|Author = 成大中
|Year = 18C
|Key Concepts= Aphorism
|Translator = [[2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)#Participants | Participants of 2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced Translation Group)]]
|Editor =
|Translation Year = 2018

}}
[[File:Backward.png|right|40px|link=2018 Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)#Primary Sources for Korean Studies]]

=='''Introduction'''==

This short essay by Sŏngdaejung(成大中, Seongdaejung) provides a social background and justification for the policy of emancipating the slaves.

His status as a son of concubine(庶孼) seems to imply his personal connection with this rebellious groups of slaves described in the document. In the late Choson period, the capital suffered from the activities of many lawless gangs. With the increase of monetary economy and market, the number of people who were detached from the land and subsisted on their participation in the market economy has grown. At the same time, this new domain of social action opened up social places where people with grievances toward government can gather. The member of these gang spanned all the classes of Choson society. In particular, one type of gang, called the compact of swords(劍契, Kŏmgye), consisted mainly of sons of concubine and Chungin(中人, the middle person).<ref> 238쪽.</ref> Although Sŏngdaejung went high up in the hierarchy of officialdom, he might have real connection through this widespread network of gangs.

The presence of the stature of Buddha is also interesting. According to a research, the gangs made a compact of swords and followers against the nobles based on its faith in Maitreya Buddha.

Although the source of this story is unclear, the slave gang that appears in the story is likely to be one of these newly formed gangs in the late Choson period. In the wandering commoners and the run-away slaves often came to Seoul for living, and as a result the population of the capital increased fast. These people often resided outside the gates of the capital city. The geographical reference of the event in the document is also the outside of one of those gates(惠化門外).

The reference to Kija also appears in the Royal instruction that proclaims the emancipation of the government slaves.<ref>순조실록 2권, 순조 1년 1월 28일 을사. http://sillok.history.go.kr/id/kwa_10101028_003 </ref>. One of the Eight Regulations attributed to Kija says those convicted as thieves shall be punished by turning them into slavery. The royal instruction and this essay argues it was only a temporary measure and not to be inherited by the descendants of the punished slaves.

The reference to firewood also indicates that these are the slaves or daily laborers who subsisted mainly by providing their manual labor. Also, the fact that they are identified by their work rather than their master's house might indicate the confusion between the categories of slaves as master's property and daily laborers.

In connection with the Master-Slave compact document of the same period, this essay shows the social change surrounding the status of slaves in the late Choson. Ahn Seungjun, who discovered the Master-Slave compact document, argues that they are symptomatic of the growing social power and grievances of slaves which pressured the government to emancipate the government slaves.<ref>안승준. 2018. "공노비 혁파, 76,067명의 노비문서를 불사르다." 장서각아카데미 왕실문화강좌. http://jsg.aks.ac.kr/cmm/fms/FileDown.do?fileSn=0&atchFileId=FILE_000000000008328</ref>

=='''Original Script'''==

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-size:110%; color:#002080; background-color:#ffffff;"
!style="width:40%;"|Classical Chinese || style="width:60%;"| English
|-
|
惠化門外川東石壁，覆以石簷，雙柱支之，亦皆石也。壁面刻佛一軀，目以奴佛，名其川曰佛川。城東樵奴，日聚其下，仰詈之曰，使吾屬爲人奴者，是佛也，佛何眼而視我。聳鐮而鑿之，兩眼皆霔。虐使之怨，乃移於佛，可不畏哉。且其諺云，無是佛則亦無奴。無奴尙可，石佛孰使之無也。余少時，尙見其高峙，其趾川也，每歲大潦，山剝淵實，數十年之間，積沙齊簷，佛軀盡埋，無力可除，果然無是佛也。英宗辛亥，命良産從母，奴婢始縮，而今則無奴婢者居多。今上辛酉，命燒內寺奴婢案，公賤盡矣，私賤肯從役哉。終必歸於無也。大抵世奴婢，非中華聖世法也，獨我東有之。箕子懲盜，創一時之法也，豈使之世役哉。卒乃怨毒，至於鑿佛眼，佛如有靈，當爲之涕而不怒也。今則公籍盡灰，萬眉皆伸，祈天永命，莫大於是。今歲之大熟，歲歲可期，福歸於國，澤歸於奴，無奴婢之家，不足恤也。且亦豈無自賣者耶。此古法也，特不世奴婢爾。

||
(translation)

Slaves’ Buddha and the Public Slaves Emancipated

Outside the Hyehwa gate, there is a stone wall on the east of the stream. it is covered by a stone roof and supported by two pillars, which are also made of stones. On the surface of the wall is carved a body of Buddha. They call it as slaves' Buddha and also names the stream Buddha's stream. The firewood slaves on the east of the city wall has been gathering from day to day under this Buddha. Scolding it as they look up the Buddha, they said "that which made us become the slaves of others is this Buddha. With what eyes, does this Buddha see us?" Raising the sickle, they made holes into it, and the two eyes of Buddha wept. The resentment of cruel labor is moved to the Buddha; could it not be feared? Their vernacular says once there is no this Buddha, then there will be no slaves. Making slaves none is rather possible, as to this stone Buddha who would be able to make it none? When I was child, I still saw the high hill and the low stream. There was great rain each year. The hill got shaved, and the marsh got thick. After 10 years, the accumulated sand reached the eaves of the roof. The body of the Buddha was completely buried. There was no way to get rid of the sand. Truly, there was no this Buddha. In Shinhae(辛亥 Sinhae) year of King Yŏngjo(英宗, Yeongjo)'s reign, those who were born from the commoner women was ordered to follow the maternal status. The number of slaves began declining, and today there are numerous houses without slaves. In Shinyu(Sinyu) year of our King's reign, the slave register of the place temples was ordered to be burned, and the government slavery was abolished; Would the private slaves be willing to be worked? It will be led to being none in the end. In general, the slaves that is inherited(needs a better translation) was not a model from the Sagely era of the Central Efflorescence. Only our country has this; it was a momentary measure that was created when Kija(箕子, Gija) punished the thieves. How would he have made them to be worked for generations? The poison of resentment finally reached to that of digging out the eyes of the Buddha. The Buddha, as if it has a soul, wept and did not get angry as this is being done. The government is now burnt to ashed. When it comes to straightening eyebrows and praying the eternal life to Heaven, there has been nothing that is greater than this. The great flourishing of this period is enough to be hoped for years. The wealth returns to the state, and the benefits goes to the slaves. The house without slaves do not need the relief. Also, how the [benefits] will only be none of those that sells themselves. This law of the ancients is simply not-keeping succeeding slaves to later generations(not sure of this translation yet).

|-
|}

=='''Discussion Questions'''==
#
#

=='''Further Readings'''==

*
*

=='''Translation'''==

==='''(sample) : Jaeyoon Song'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 1 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 2 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 3 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 4 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 5 : Inho Choi'''===
----
*Translations:
Outside the Hyehwa gate, there is a stone wall on the east of the stream. it is covered by a stone roof and supported by two pillars, which are also made of stones. On the surface of the wall is carved a body of Buddha. They call it as slaves' Buddha and also names the stream Buddha's stream. One day, those firewood slaves on the east of the city wall gathered under this Buddha. Scolding it as they look up the Buddha, they said "that which made us become the slaves of others is this Buddha. With what eyes, does this Buddha see us?" Raising the sickle, they made holes into it, and the two eyes of Buddha wept. The resentment of cruel labor is moved to the Buddha; could it not be feared? Their vernacular says once there is no this Buddha, then there will be no slaves. Making slaves none is rather possible, as to this stone Buddha who would be able to make it none? When I was child, I still saw the high hill and the low stream. There was great rain each year. The hill got shaved, and the marsh got thick. After 10 years, the accumulated sand reached the eaves of the roof. The body of the Buddha was completely buried. There was no way to get rid of the sand. Truly, there was no this Buddha. In Shinhae(辛亥 Sinhae) year of King Yŏngjo(英宗, Yeongjo)'s reign, those who were born from the commoner women was ordered to follow the maternal status. The number of slaves began declining, and today there are numerous houses without slaves. In Shinyu(Sinyu) year of our King's reign, the slave register of the place temples was ordered to be burned, and the government slavery was abolished; Would the private slaves be willing to be worked? It will be led to being none in the end. In general, the slaves that is inherited(needs a better translation) was not a model from the Sagely era of the Central Efflorescence. Only our country has this; it was a momentary measure that was created when Kija(箕子, Gija) punished the thieves. How would he have made them to be worked for generations? The poison of resentment finally reached to that of digging out the eyes of the Buddha. The Buddha, as if it has a soul, wept and did not get angry as this is being done. The government is now burnt to ashed. When it comes to straightening eyebrows and praying the eternal life to Heaven, there has been nothing that is greater than this. The great flourishing of this period is enough to be hoped for years. The wealth returns to the state, and the benefits goes to the slaves. The house without slaves do not need the relief. Also, how the [benefits] will only be none of those that sells themselves. This law of the ancients is simply not-keeping succeeding slaves to later generations(not sure of this translation yet).

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 6 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 7 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 8 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 9 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 10 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 11 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 12 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 13 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

==='''Student 14 : (Write your name)'''===
----

*Discussion Questions:

[[Category:2018 Hanmun Summer Workshop]]
[[Category:Advanced Translation Group]]

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 鳳林大君封爵賞賜敎旨

(Translation) 都膺王旨

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥 箕子實記

파일:기자실기4.JPG

파일:기자실기5.JPG

파일:기자실기2.JPG

파일:기자실기3.JPG

파일:기자실기 1.JPG

2018 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)

파일:ITKC MO 0201A A044 292L.jpg

2018 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)

2018 JSG Summer Hanmun Workshop (Advanced)

파일:ITKC MO 0201A A044 292L.jpg

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日 李乃蕃 戶口單子

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

파일:곤여만국전도 야차국2.png

파일:곤여만국전도 야차국.png

(Translation) 李睟光 外國3

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 成大中 靑城雜記 醒言

(Translation) 陳忠貴王旨

(Translation) 李睟光 外國

(Translation) 李濟開國功臣敎書

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 李珥箕子實記

(Translation) 乾隆二十一年正月日李乃蕃戶口單子

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 李睟光外國3

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 成大中靑城雜記醒言

(Translation) 李睟光外國